“Gypsies” and Other Fantasy Beings
“…Romanies turn up with some frequency — never as characters who happen incidentally also to be Gypsies, but because they are Gypsies, and because they serve a specific purpose. This purpose has, broadly speaking, three manifestations: the Gypsy as liar and thief either of property or (especially) of non-Romani children; the Gypsy as witch or caster of spells; and the Gypsy as romantic figure.” –Ian Hancock
#
The SF/F genre has a particular fascination with “Gypsies.” Maybe it’s the romanticized freedom of the road, the independence of a people who reject the soul-shriveling laws of the civilized world to live however and wherever they choose. Maybe it’s the mysticism, the magic of old Romani women and their curses. Maybe it’s the sex appeal of eager young lasses and virile men. Or maybe it’s just the fashion sense, because scarves and sparklies are cool!
I’m sure most of us recognize that by now, this has become a pretty common trope, even a cliche, in the genre. But hey, they’re fun. They’re part of the history of our genre. And stories never hurt anyone! “Gypsies” are just another fantasy race, like elves and mermaids and dwarves, right? It’s not like we’re talking about real people with real cultures and histories. [/Sarcasm]
- “The 1997 figure reported by the late Dr Sybil Milton, then senior historian at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Research Institute in Washington put the number of Romani lives lost by 1945 at ‘between a half and one and a half million.'” (Source)
Have you ever wondered where the term “gypped” came from? Let me put it this way. Saying you got gypped is right up there with saying you got “jewed,” based on the bigoted presumption that those people are all swindlers and cheats and thieves. But it’s not like those stereotypes cause any real harm or damage today, right?
- “In the Czech Republic, 79% of respondents to a 2003-04 survey said they wouldn’t want Roma as neighbors.” (Source)
- “[P]olice in Liguria gave out preprinted complaint templates for theft, which included a tickbox labelled ‘gypsies’ i.e. offering theft victims the chance to report Roma as the culprits. No other ethnicity was included on the form.” (Source)
- Italian Interior Minister Roberto Maroni responded to a wave of violence against the Roma people with the quote, “That is what happens when Gypsies steal babies.” (Source)
- Italy’s highest appeals court overthrew the conviction of six people for racially discriminatory propaganda, saying that their aversion to the Roma people, “was not determined by the Gypsy nature of the people discriminated against, but by the fact that all the Gypsies were thieves.” (Emphasis added; Source)
As long as we’re talking, how about a few more examples of prejudice and discrimination?
- “The European Court of Human Rights has affirmed that school segregation of Romani children (in schools for children with disabilities and in separate schools or classes in mainstream schools) constitutes illegal discrimination in judgments against the Czech Republic (2007), Greece (2008) and Croatia (2010). Despite these rulings, educational segregation of Romani children is systemic in many European countries.” (Source)
- “The [Czech] government expressed its regret to Roma women who were sterilized without their consent but admitted the practice may still be taking place.” (Emphasis added; Source)
- “[T]he Roma populations face considerable obstacles to the enjoyment of basic rights, notably in the fields of access to health care, housing, education and employment and are often disproportionately affected by poverty. Discrimination and racism, also resulting in violence, remain serious problems throughout the continent, and present a major impediment to the full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms.” (Source)
- Police recently removed a blonde-haired, blue-eyed girl from the Roma family she was with. Because everyone knows those gypsies are child-stealers, right? “DNA tests have proved that a seven-year-old girl taken from a Roma family in Dublin on Monday is their daughter.” (Source)
Well, at least this kind of racism isn’t a problem here in the United States, right?
- It’s not like we have major newspapers asking “Are the Roma Primitive, or Just Poor?“
- Or major television shows telling stories of murderous, child-stealing gypsies.
- Or retired police detectives writing articles about how “Gypsies choose a lifestyle of thievery, one that is as natural to them as eating and sleeping.”
I’m not saying science fiction and fantasy is full of people who are actively trying to be racist, or deliberately working to continue the kind of hatred and violence and bigotry described above. I suspect a lot of us, especially in the U.S., barely give it a second thought.
We don’t even realize the term “gypsy” is offensive and/or distasteful to many, basically a racial slur.
Overt, deliberate, blatant racism tends to be easier to identify and denounce. I doubt most authors are deliberately trying to base their writing on racist stereotypes, any more than I think costume companies said, “Hey, the world doesn’t have enough racism or sexism yet, so let’s do another line of ‘Sexy Gypsy’ costumes!”
That doesn’t change the fact that we’re buying into the racism. As authors, we’re perpetuating it. We’re reinforcing the stereotypes and teaching our audience that this is what the Roma people are — that they’re magical, hypersexual thieves.
I remarked this past weekend that I love my SF/F geeks, but we’ve got some issues. Our complicitness in ignoring or erasing real people and replacing them with cliche and stereotype is one of them.
We need to do better.
Wayne West
October 31, 2013 @ 10:11 am
I was the president of our home owner’s association when we were in the process of repainting the complex. We had a lot of people from Serbo-Croatia, very nice people, and there was an old guy who apparently was also an elder in their church, let’s call him Bob. There was no way that I was going to assume the risk of having the board mandate the color and having perpetual complaints, so one meeting we’re discussing the wall color and trim color and putting together three choices that the home owners could vote on. After one meeting Bob came up to me, actually shook his finger in my face, and in his heavily accented voice said ‘No gypsy colors!’
Didn’t bother explaining if any of the colors that we were going to put forth for vote constituted gypsy colors. But since no one subsequently complained, I guess we got it right.
TheGrumpyBuddha
October 31, 2013 @ 10:22 am
I don’t know what people have against the Roma — I ran into one of them the other day and his daughter came up to me and told me that I should be THINNER, or something. Since then, I’ve lost ten pounds in two days! I really needed to lose some weight, too. Things are looking good!
LongStrider
October 31, 2013 @ 10:36 am
Earlier this year there was a book from a best selling author with the title Gypped. It made me cry inside every time someone came in and asked to put it on hold.
Kathryn (@Loerwyn)
October 31, 2013 @ 10:58 am
Good post, Jim. One I almost entirely agree with.
I’m not sure if this is a regional thing or not, but I’m sure someone will correct me. I was under the impression that “gypsy” is actually a correct term for certain groups of travelling folk (a better term for nomadic people as a whole, I believe, is “travellers”) with specific heritages and cultural values, but through ignorance and hatred it’s become a disparaging term for travellers in general.
Jim C. Hines
October 31, 2013 @ 12:21 pm
I’m not sure I can answer this one, due to my own ignorance. But from talking to people and the reading I’ve done, I can at least affirm that it’s seen as a racist by many on the receiving end.
It sounds like cultural/national issues come into play here as well. For example, I’m told in the UK, that “gypsy” is the legal term, despite various objections :-/
Jim C. Hines
October 31, 2013 @ 12:21 pm
::Facepalm::
Amy B.
October 31, 2013 @ 12:33 pm
This post does a great job of breaking down terms for nomadic peoples: http://racialicious.tumblr.com/post/29559695583/insteadofusinggypsythepicturedictionary
Origins of the word point to it being one that Europeans used to refer to them, rather than one they used themselves. There are certainly folks who have reclaimed the word, but unless you know that a person prefers to be called that, and that they aren’t wrongly appropriating the term, best to avoid it.
Andrija Popovic
October 31, 2013 @ 12:38 pm
This comment in particular had me shaking my head and instinctively apologizing for my father. *sigh*
Allison
October 31, 2013 @ 1:03 pm
I have no idea how people of actual nomad heritage feel about it, but Mercedes Lackey’s recent Elemental Masters book Steadfast features a part-nomad main character. Througout the book they are referred to as ‘Travelers,’ never ‘gypsies.’ The cover is unfortunately whitewashed and looks nothing like the character as described but the text at least makes an effort to be politically correct in the midst of a fantasy.
Kathryn (@Loerwyn)
October 31, 2013 @ 5:00 pm
That’s fair enough. Whenever I hear it it is, easily, 99% of the time used in a derogatory way.
Kathryn (@Loerwyn)
October 31, 2013 @ 5:00 pm
Oh, excellent! Thank you!
Dor
November 1, 2013 @ 6:29 am
Touching on what Katheryn was saying above, in the UK and Ireland there are two ethnic groups who get referred to as Gypsies. The Roma, or Rom, who are originally from Bulgaria; and the Travellers, who are a white minority and originate in Ireland (Brad Pitt in Snatch). “Gypsy” is a term I’ve heard plenty of Travellers use to refer to themselves, but the term “Pikey” is considered incredibly offensive.
Eric Juneau
November 1, 2013 @ 12:48 pm
I always thought “gypsy” was considered a way of life, not a race. Like “circus folk” (although I’m not saying romani=circus folk). I could be wrong, but I wouldn’t know how to tell a gypsy from someone native to those lands except by their behavior or presence.
Gypsies are very under-represented in media of any sort, so a lot of their mystery has never been debunked. I think there’s a reality show called “My big fat gypsy wedding” or something like that. Kind of the same way “Toddlers and Tiaras” and “Honey Boo Boo” put a face on the people who participate in youth beauty pageants.
I’m not saying that reality shows = reality, but if, instead of presenting a stereotype, presenting a member of that tribe with a face and back story and relationships and a life, that’s more fair than blanketing all with judgements passed down through the years.
Stereotyping the Roma in SF&F | Atypically Epic
November 1, 2013 @ 2:26 pm
[…] Jim C. Hines blogs about “Gypsies” and Other Fantasy Beings […]
NaNoWriMo Day 1 | Lindsay Kitson - Dieselpunk Author
November 1, 2013 @ 2:37 pm
[…] related: I read an article a couple days ago, by Jim C. Hines. It wasn’t new information to me – I had read things about prejudice against Roma […]
Reno Hates Me
November 1, 2013 @ 4:57 pm
I’m in the same camp as Eric Juneau. I grew up thinking gypsy referred to traveling homeless thieves (similar to hobos, except hobos were males who rode trains and gypsies were families of thieves), not a particular race.
I certainly could not tell an ethnic Roma, but then again I can’t tell many races by sight. I think that’s a positive aspect of being a longer term American, descended from a diverse group of people who travelled a lot… Kind of like (mostly) law abiding…. Uh… Is that my foot near my mouth?
Updates from the Lair 11/03/13 - On Starships and Dragonwings
November 3, 2013 @ 8:49 am
[…] Jim C. Hines pointed out the damage that the gypsy trope in fantasy can do to the Roma people who are struggling with stereotypes enough as it is. Did you know that multiple children were wrongly removed from their families recently because they were blonde and so authorities thought they were kidnapped?? DNA testing proved otherwise, doh! […]
Hatgirl
November 6, 2013 @ 11:09 am
Ah. I wasn’t going to bring it up, but seeing as you’ve blogged about the topic…
I winced when I saw the company you are selling your charity calendars through is called “Tinker’s Pack”. Here in Ireland, members of the Travelling community consider the name “tinker” to be an offensive ethnic slur. I’m a bit weirded out just typing it…
http://www.nccri.ie/cdsu-travellers.html
Jim C. Hines
November 6, 2013 @ 11:44 am
Well, crud. Thank you, I was unaware of that.
I’ll pass this along to the Worldbuilders folks who run and maintain the site, thanks.
Monkey
November 7, 2013 @ 8:32 am
Man, saw that Criminal Minds ep recently …that was bad. So bad. They could have simply made some crazy cult of people who did the whole -steal young people for spouses- thing, or something. urgh.
Anyway, this post is fabulous. I’m a member of a social network where this (among other similarish things) has been argued to death due to some people simply not getting it (“but it just means this group of people, it’s not a slur!” etc, you know the drill), and this post explains the issues very clearly and succinctly. Thank you very much for that!
Eric Juneau
November 7, 2013 @ 9:53 am
See, this is why I feel political correctness and is just not worth it. No matter what you do, someone, somewhere is going to disapprove of what you’re doing.
I mean I support certain things like renaming the Washington Redskins (an archaic term that has demonstratable current implications). But I had no idea what a “tar baby” I was eight or ten and some textbook told me it has “racial implications”. If I hadn’t read that, I would have spent the rest of my life with the knowledge it was just a baby-shaped mannequin made out of tar.
Just like I would have lived the rest of my life not knowing “tinker” was offensive if Hatgirl hadn’t said anything. But the only place I know “tinker” from is Rothfuss’s Kingkiller Chronicles and “Tinkerbell”. Now I’ll know not to call an Irish tourist a “tinker”.
There’s always going to be things like this. Rolling euphemisms, political correctness, unintentional double entendres. People wanted The Two Towers to change its name to “be sensitive” to 9/11. I get sick of cleaning and child care commercials that imply I have no role in that in my house. But it’s not worth writing letters over.
At what point does it stop being racially sensitive to niche groups and start ridiculously compensating for a few individuals? Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right.
Jim C. Hines
November 7, 2013 @ 10:17 am
“I started imagining a world in which we replaced the phrase ‘politically correct’ wherever we could with ‘treating other people with respect’, and it made me smile.”
–Neil Gaiman
Steuard
November 22, 2013 @ 1:05 pm
Belated comment here: When I think of “Gypsies” in sci-fi, the book that jumps to mind (which I read years ago as a kid) is Dragonsdawn, by Anne McCaffrey. One of the main characters comes from a nomadic family, and (among other things) the offensiveness of the term “Tinker” comes up in the story. As far as I recall (which is admittedly pretty vague), it’s a reasonably sympathetic portrayal.