Thinking About Freedom of Speech
So this is International Blog Against Racism Week, which seems like a perfect time to point to the Open Letter from the Carl Brandon Society on racial/gender discourse.
I’m hopeful that, as in previous years, I’ll learn some things and get to read and participate in some good discussions this week. But reading that letter, I found myself wondering how long it would be before I came across the first “Oh noes, the PC Nazis are Censorin’ our Free Speech!” response. (Answer: not long at all, as it turns out.)
Let’s start with the PC part. I’m not sure when “Politically Correct” turned into such a ridiculous phrase. The belief seems to be that, in order to be truly politically correct, I must immediately go through my goblin books, rewriting the goblins as hygienically impaired, height challenged creatures with alternative dietary habits. (Actually, now I want to write a story about Veka demanding that the rest of the world describe her as a goblyn, but that’s a tangent.) The point is, people have waved their wands and cast reductio ad absurdium on the whole concept. We’ve turned it into a joke (perhaps because then it’s easier to ignore it, and we don’t have to actually do anything?)
I keep thinking about the first time someone told me what “politically correct” meant to them. She said, “I want to be able to choose what label people use to describe me.” Why is that such a ridiculous premise? It is really so absurd to think that an individual should have the right to say “I prefer to be called ________”? To choose to be addressed by a label that isn’t demeaning, insulting, or simply not what that person wants to be called? People don’t seem to mind that I prefer to be called Jim rather than James, but if the Carl Brandon Society tells Harlan Ellison not to use the term NWA, suddenly it’s a massive inconvenience and political correctness is censoring our freedom.
It annoys me how easily we toss the word “censorship” around. Spend 30 seconds reading the comment threads for just about any news article that touches on race (the Gates/Crowley stories should provide plenty of reading). Trust me, there ain’t no PC Censors working in this country.
Complaining because someone censored your comment on his/her blog not only misses the meaning of the word, it’s also rather insulting to those people who have actually had to deal with censorship.
- People disagreeing with you is not censorship.
- People stating that they don’t like your cover art and think its racist, sexist, or whatever, is not censorship.
- People banning you from their blogs is not censorship.
- For the writers out there, an editor rejecting your story for his/her publication is not censorship.
- People saying they don’t like something you said is not censorship.
- People telling you racial slurs are unacceptable is not censorship.
- People criticising, mocking, or insulting you for choosing to use racial slurs is not censorship.
The nice thing about my country is that you’re free to say just about anything you like. I don’t have any obligation to provide a platform for your words, but you can certainly go out and create your own. The very fact that people are writing 1000+ word rants on their blogs about being censored tends to undermine their point.
But freedom of speech does not equal freedom from criticism. If you say something offensive, you’re probably going to get challenged on it. If that’s a problem for you, you might want to examine your words more carefully. Either that or move somewhere that censorship actually exists — that way you can start suppressing those who disagree with you.
We talk about freedom of speech, but I hear very little about responsibility for speech. You choose your words. You’re responsible for what you say. If you say something offensive or insulting, that’s on you. You might disagree over whether something is offensive, but now we’re getting back to political correctness. Tell me, who has the right to say whether the word “nigger” is insulting? Do I as a white man get to tell black people that they’re overreacting and shouldn’t be offended if I use that term?
To put it another way, Freedom of speech does not protect you from the consequences of saying stupid shit.
August 2, 2009 @ 1:52 pm
Censorship is defined as the activity of a censor; the definition of a censor includes both “any person who supervises the manners or morality of others” and “an adverse critic; faultfinder.”
So all of those things you’ve listed are in fact forms of censorship. Maybe you should look up what the word actually means before you get upset about people misusing it?
Jim C. Hines
August 2, 2009 @ 1:59 pm
So according to this secondary definition you copied and pasted from the first online dictionary you could find, you would say that you’re censoring me by posting your comment?
That’s seriously the point you want to make here?
August 13, 2009 @ 4:47 am
Hi, I wanted to ask (as you said maybe a collection of your stories will be in the Czech Republic), will be whether in Czech?
Jim C. Hines
August 13, 2009 @ 7:20 am
Nothing solid for a collection yet, though I’ll have one coming out in Pevnost either later this year or early in 2010.