What is Rape Culture?
Last night, I posted the following on Facebook and Tumblr:
It’s not that Ken Hoinsky ran a Kickstarter campaign to fund his book, “A Guide to Getting Awesome with Women,” filled with advice for aspiring rapists, like “Physically pick her up and sit her on your lap. Don’t ask for permission. Be dominant.”
It’s that 732 people backed his project on Kickstarter. That they donated more than eight times what Hoinsky was asking for.
Think about that the next time someone belittles the idea of rape culture.
This led to a side discussion about what “rape culture” meant. The suggestion came up that the phrase is a dog whistle that prevents honest discussion and implies all men are rapists and rape-enablers.
Okay, given the seven billion people in this world, I’m sure you can find one who believes all men are rapists, but that isn’t what that phrase has meant in any conversation I can remember having. (It is what I’ve seen some “Men’s Rights” advocates try to claim it means, because it gives them a way to derail discussion.)
I use “rape culture” to describe a society in which sexual violence is common, underreported, and underprosecuted, where rape victims are blamed or even prosecuted for trying to report the crime. A society that turns its back on rape survivors, or blames them for wearing the wrong clothes, drinking the wrong things, sending the wrong signals, putting themselves in the wrong situation, and so on. A society that treats women as objects and encourages men to be sexually aggressive, to see sex as a game to be won.
Does this mean all men believe women who are raped deserve it? That’s as silly as saying “The U.S. has a strong gun culture” = “All Americans are gun owners” or “Tumblr is full of fandom culture” = “All Tumblr posts are about fandom.”
Okay, fine, the argument goes. But that doesn’t prove this so-called “rape culture” actually exists. You worked as a rape counselor and spend a lot of time talking about this. Doesn’t that give you a distorted, overblown sense of the problem?
My sense has always been that my experience has helped open my eyes to a problem most people tend to ignore or minimize. That experience has included a fair amount of time reading research and articles about rape in our world.
Prevalence:
Back in 1995, the AMA described rape as the most underreported crime in America. It’s difficult to get exact numbers, but here’s some of the research and statistics discussing just how common rape really is.
- According to the U. S. Department of Justice, there were a total of 52,470 rapes in 2008. Women are victimized approximately four times as frequently as men. Even if you disregard issues of underreporting, that’s about 10,000 men and 40,000 women raped in a single year in this country.
- A National Institute of Justice study found that 18% of women — almost 1 in 5 — experienced a completed or attempted rape at some point in their lives.
- According to a 2007 study by the Medical University of South Carolina, roughly 1 in 20 of college women were raped in a single year. You can extrapolate that to a 1 in 5 chance of being raped over the course of a four-year college career.
- The same study notes that only about 12% of these rapes were reported to police.
- From the World Health Organization report on Violence Against Women: “In a random sample of 420 women in Toronto, Canada, 40% reported at least one episode of forced sexual intercourse since the age of 16.”
Men as Perpetrators:
It’s true that not all rapists are men, nor are all victims women. However, the vast majority of rapists are indeed male, and women are raped at a significantly greater rate than men. Looking specifically at men as rapists…
- A study from 1981, which is admittedly out of date, found that 35% of college men said they would commit rape under certain circumstances if they thought they could get away with it.
- A 1991 study found that 56% of high school girls and 76% of the boys “believed forced sex was acceptable under some circumstances.” (White, Jacqueline W. and John A. Humphrey)
- In this article from 2010, psychologist David Lisak found that 1 in 16 men admitted to committing rape, though few men labelled it as such.
- Another article by Lisak and Miller looked at the research and found that between 6% and 14.9% of men admitted to committing rape.
How Our Culture Facilitates Rape:
Once again, these are just a handful of examples that illustrate our culture’s attitudes toward rape and rape victims, and the impact of those attitudes.
- In a 2002 study of athletes, Sawyer found that “both male and female respondents, though predominately males, felt that about half of all reported rapes were invented by women. In other words, it was believed that women lied about being raped 50% of the time.” (Source)
- Most rapes are not reported to the police. (Source) Reasons for not reporting include:
- Shame/embarrassment
- Fear of reprisal
- Fear of police bias
- A review of 37 studies found that “men displayed a significantly higher endorsement of rape myth acceptance (RMA) than women. RMA was also strongly associated with hostile attitudes and behaviors toward women.” (Source)
- Men who have peer support for behaving in an emotionally violent manner toward women and for being physically and sexually violent toward women are 10 times more likely to commit sexual aggression toward women. (Source)
You also see these things, if you look, in our daily lives. In reporting that sympathizes with the rapists or emphasizes the victim’s looks, in rape prevention efforts that put the responsibility for stopping rape on women, in the way we conflate rape and sex, in jokes that minimize or belittle rape, in the way we expect rape to be a normal part of our fiction, in stories of police hostility to rape victims, in legal battles where the popular defense is victim-blaming, and so much more.
When I use the phrase rape culture, I’m not saying, “Hey buddy, did you know that you are personally an evil rapist and responsible for all the rape?” I’m saying we have a culture in which rape is widespread, and the reasons are many and multilayered.
When women talk about men as potential rapists, they’re not saying all men are animals who will commit rape at the slightest opportunity; they’re pointing out that because rape is so widespread, and because the perpetrators are so often “normal-looking” men, frequently friends and family, it creates an atmosphere of distrust and fear. Heck, doesn’t the fact that we focus prevention efforts almost exclusively on women essentially require women to treat all men as potential rapists?
And when men respond to these conversations by trying to reframe them as a personal attack or accusation, it takes the focus off of the problem of rape and derails the conversation.
Russ Hansen
June 21, 2013 @ 5:44 pm
No Jim, that’s pretty much the only diff. You and I are both compassionate, caring men who want to end violence against women.
Only problem is, you don’t understand the campaign against men. I don’t believe you are familiar with radical feminism, I don’t believe you knew who Andrea Dworkin is, or the kinds of things she wrote which are still used as a cudgel against men in modern society.
Suffice it to say that you cannot have a rational discussion about “rape culture,” because the entire thing is semantic poison. I have considered everything you have written above, and more than that, and I think the whole thing is a damned myth, and a misnomer for a very much simpler phenomenon:
People don’t want to be held accountable for their actions.
And that includes any man who would malign other men with the myth of a culture designed to use rape as an implicit and accepted threat against women in order to keep them in line. That is the accepted academic definition of “rape culture” and it DOES NOT EXIST IN THE US. If anything, rape is an allegation that can destroy any man because it is such an incredible taboo in our culture.
So your individual and personal definition pales in comparison with what the term actually means, in radical feminist propaganda, and when the WHO talks about rape issues in countries that truly treat rape victims as criminals who asked for it.
To say that a common defense for rape qualifies as anything more than a bad idea, to say that it is literally our _culture_, is a grave mischaracterization, and I reject it as such.
Gowan
June 21, 2013 @ 5:50 pm
” The best I can come up with is to raise your daughters to have a spine of steel …”
If that’s the best you can come up with, you’re very uncreative.
What about, you know, raising your sons to NOT RAPE in the first place? To raise your sons to not blame victims? To raise your sons to fight rape culture?
You better fight rape culture now rather than fantasize about what a spine of steel you will force your daughters to evolve. Always keep in mind that, if you don’t have daughters yet, your future daughters may well turn out to be shy, delicate flowers, be bad at sports, and completely unable to defend themselves.
Keep in mind that you cannot force someone to have a spine of steel.
Gowan
June 21, 2013 @ 6:06 pm
“Should anyone bring up the idea that rape is a culturally supported thing in the US, they are wrong.”
No, they’re not. Unless you mean to imply that Steubenville, like, for example, Bielefeld, is not a real place, and everything that happened there, including the nauseating support and pity the rapists got, was just invented by … I don’t know, radical feminists?
Jim C. Hines
June 21, 2013 @ 6:10 pm
Tell you what. I laid out plenty of research and facts to support my argument that yes, we do indeed have a culture that facilitates rape in a systemic way. You’re welcome to write all that off as a myth, of course. I can’t control your thoughts or opinions.
When you can do the same to back up your own position here, let me know.
MadGastronomer
June 21, 2013 @ 6:12 pm
Actually, minds do get changed by this. Just because you’re unwilling to listen to anyone who doesn’t cater to you — and almost certainly to anyone who does, the tone argument being a bullshit excuse to not listen, generally covering up that the person making it really wants not to be told that they’re wrong — doesn’t mean that it’s true in all cases. Some people are actually convinced by anger and emotion and strong stances where they aren’t by the sort of dispassionate discussion you’re demanding, because it makes the topic real to them, where it’s not otherwise, for exactly the reasons Jim talks about. They don’t think they know anyone who’s actually affected by it, it’s just an abstract.
There is no level on which the tone argument is a valid argument. It is not true that people in general are more likely to be convinced by surface politeness, it is not true that the people making the tone argument are more likely to be convinced by surface politeness, it is not true that no one is convinced by angry words.
And you are defending rape culture by your bullshit tricks. You have been informed of your ignorance. You are insisting on clinging to it, and using the whine “But it’s your job to educate me!” as an excuse. Take responsibility for your own education and actions.
Jim C. Hines
June 21, 2013 @ 6:13 pm
As far as I can tell, he’s not saying Steubenville doesn’t exist; but he doesn’t think our culture was intelligently designed with a conscious and deliberate effort to use rape as a tool for subjugating women, which presumably would have needed been written into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers, and therefore rape culture is a myth used to destroy men. Because logic, I guess.
Russ Hansen
June 21, 2013 @ 6:17 pm
[GOBLINS RULE, HUMANS DROOL! Also, arguing is hard. Can’t we just go back to eating trolls?]
Russ Hansen
June 21, 2013 @ 6:22 pm
[Why don’t the humans surrender to us? Why do they demand things like logic and facts? Don’t they know goblins have bigger fangs? Stupid humans!!!]
Jim C. Hines
June 21, 2013 @ 6:27 pm
Russ,
I told you to come back when you had facts to back up your arguments. You haven’t done so.
Allow me to introduce you to the Goblin setting on the blog, modeled after the famed “Kitten” setting.
Yours,
Jim
Damiana
June 21, 2013 @ 6:31 pm
Dude. Andrea Dworkin is from THIRTY YEARS AGO. Get yourself up to date, m’kay?
Here. I’ll help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-wave_feminism
Russ Hansen
June 21, 2013 @ 6:39 pm
[This comment was eaten by an unruly fire-spider]
Damiana
June 21, 2013 @ 6:43 pm
Yes! Given that (for instance) politics, science and the REST of our lives have changed so radically in the past 30 years, why do you insist on living in the past when it comes to feminism and what it means?
Also, what do you use to get the troll meat out from between your fangs?
Russ Hansen
June 21, 2013 @ 6:44 pm
[Showing the humans our fangs didn’t work. Maybe we should try a more advanced form of debate. Someone throw a rock at them!]
Jim C. Hines
June 21, 2013 @ 6:51 pm
Sorry, Damiana. Russ’ comments have run afoul of the goblin horde.
Damiana
June 21, 2013 @ 6:52 pm
Goblining is an AWESOME way to deal with trolls. 😀
Russ Hansen
June 21, 2013 @ 6:57 pm
Fuck you.
[The goblins have chosen not to mess with this one, out of respect for Russ’ goblin-level debating skills. They would also like to invite Russ to come to the lair to teach advanced logic and rhetoric.]
Joris M
June 21, 2013 @ 7:01 pm
Why should people be forced to change our minds for us right now when we demand it? They are already presenting the information in a nice overview for beginners, here and elsewhere. It is perfectly possible to pay attention, read along and wait until they tell what they want to express on their own terms and in their own time.
I know I encountered a lot of information, and even learned a bit that way.
Gowan
June 21, 2013 @ 7:23 pm
Ah, okay, thanks for the explanation, Jim.
The interesting thing about the “But it wasn’t deliberate” argument is that it automatically loses value when it is used to justify or deny something bad going on.
Regarding rape culture, I’d have expected it to be completely eradicated shortly after its discovery, if, indeed, almost no man really wanted it to exist.(“Oh no! We accidentally subjugated women! How could that happen? Let’s change it NOW!”)
I mean, if I tell someone they’re standing on my toes, they usually say they’re sorry and step away. They don’t claim it wasn’t intentional and therefore they didn’t really do it, or whatever.
Whatever, I guess it’s no use trying to discuss this … other than trying to get more comments that can be changed to Goblin setting, that is.
Which, admittedly, is somewhat tempting.
Beth
June 21, 2013 @ 10:00 pm
Kickstarter apologized for letting the project go through. Here’s a link: http://www.kickstarter.com/blog/we-were-wrong
(You’ve probably seen this already, but in a quick scan of the comments I didn’t see it mentioned.)
MadGastronomer
June 21, 2013 @ 11:52 pm
It occurs to me to point out to anyone else who might still be reading these comments, or who might read them in the future: This guy is using my reaction as an excuse to not listen to the people he admits have a tone he considers suitable. That’s what the tone argument is, an excuse to not listen. That’s all it ever is.
Megpie71
June 22, 2013 @ 3:26 am
In a given culture, one of the normalised attitudes is that a person of higher perceived social status has the right to demand the time, attention and polite behaviour of a person of lower perceived social status. The person of higher perceived social status is allowed to ignore refusals, to touch the person of lower perceived social status whether or not they wish to be touched, and to engage in any behaviours which they (the person of higher perceived social status) consider appropriate without querying whether or not the person of lower perceived social status considers these behaviours appropriate also. If the person of lower perceived social status refuses the overtures or advances of the person with higher perceived social status, they are regarded as behaving inappropriately, since the social framework of Western culture makes it clear that the actions of persons of higher perceived social status are to be taken by persons of lower perceived social status as compliments, flattery, and indicators of positive regard. Persons of higher perceived social status are allowed to physically force their attentions onto persons of lower perceived social status.
Now, if we make our person of higher perceived social status a male person, and our person of lower perceived social status a female person (of equivalent economic standing, equivalent levels of celebrity/fame etc) then what we’re describing is a sexist (and therefore rape-enabling) culture. If we make the person of higher perceived social status a white person, and the person of lower perceived social status a black person, we’re describing a racist culture. If we make the person of higher perceived status an able-bodied person, and the person of lower perceived status a disabled person, we’re describing an ableist culture. If we make the person of higher perceived status heterosexual and the person of lower perceived status homosexual we are describing a homophobic culture. If the higher status person is cisgender, while the lower status person is transgender, we’re describing a transphobic culture.
Western culture is all of these. Western culture normalises all of this – it quite literally makes the systematic disregard of the humanity of persons who fit into groups which are of a lower perceived social status into a normal, everyday thing. That normalisation allows people who perform misogynist, sexist, racist, ableist, homophobic, or transphobic acts to think what they are doing is a normal everyday act, a socially acceptable act, and an act which everyone else around them either agrees with, is performing themselves, or an act they would like to be performing “if they only had the guts”. This is why people who rape quite often don’t see themselves as criminals (and why their families don’t see them as criminals either) – they quite literally believe this is normal, acceptable behaviour that other people only refrain from out of some sense of “political correctness” (akin to breaking the speed limits by less than the amount required to be fined, or cutting in front of someone in traffic). They believe this because society at large tells them so, in so many different ways.
Society reinforces the message in its treatment of the people they assault, because there’s still those hierarchies of social status to be negotiated, and one of those is that a person of higher perceived social status will intrinsically be believed more readily than a person of lower perceived social status. The person of lower perceived social status has to be willing to supply evidence in order for their statements to be heard; they have to be willing to continue speaking out even as the society around them attempts to shut them up and sideline them. They are less likely to be taken seriously, less likely to be believed, less likely to be treated with respect (because the society normalises and systematises the disregard of their humanity – see paragraph 3), more likely to be told to keep quiet, more likely to be told they’re over-reacting, more likely to be told their opinion doesn’t count, and so on.
That’s what “rape culture” means. It means our culture makes rape (and the behaviours leading up to it) into a normal, everyday thing. Our society makes disregarding the humanity of non-male people, and non-white people, and non-heterosexual people, and non-able-bodied people, and non-cisgender people into a normal, everyday thing. The behaviours exhibited by rapists (and encouraged by PUAs) are an extrapolation of behaviours which are considered normal and acceptable everyday interaction between people of higher perceived social status and people of lower perceived social status in our culture.
moughan
June 22, 2013 @ 4:17 am
There was an article recently in one of the Galway (Ireland) papers about the sentencing of a hotel owner who raped an employee at a holiday party after luring her away from the party by saying that he wanted to talk. The article (and the trial it described) was appalling. It described how the judge ‘took under consideration the heinous nature of the crime’, but that he accepted numerous character witnesses in favor of the defendant who all talked about what a great guy he was, and how he was a pillar of the community, and how he’d employed over 100 people, and how totally out of character it was for him, and how it was probably because he’d had to deal with the economic collapse in Ireland and it was really hard for him. I guess that’s where the friends and family are.
The judge gave him a six year sentence with credit for time served and the possibility of having two years taken off the sentence. I think the worst part of the article was that it closed with quotations from the victim given in court where she described the trauma she had suffered after the attack. Here was someone with one of those ‘spines of steel’ mentioned earlier in these comments, and what this man did to her mattered less to the judge, to his family and friends, and to the article writer than their need to see the defendant as a stand-up guy who just had ‘being a rapist’ happen to him.
Alicia
June 22, 2013 @ 5:41 am
I think this is the best break down of what makes Western culture sexist/racist/ableist I have ever read. Thank you!
jmb
June 22, 2013 @ 8:57 am
What past are you talking about? The New Bedford gang rape was 1983…
jmb
June 22, 2013 @ 9:00 am
Old newspapers are a marvelous source of disillusionment. Particularly the crime sections.
Clay Dowling
June 22, 2013 @ 3:19 pm
Thank you for this Laura.
Laura Resnick
June 22, 2013 @ 6:28 pm
Cat, thank you for bringing this up. I’m always amazed at the assumptions (how ignorant and obtuse can someone BE?) that a woman puts herself through the invasive and humiliating medical and legal ordeal your describe… because she regrets having consensual sex.
A woman who regrets having consensual sex keeps it a secret, and/or stops seeing that guy, and/or doesn’t go back to that place, and/or berates herself in the mirror, and/or tells her best friend she did something she regrets, etc.
She doesn’t decide, “Hey, I think I’ll go have every inch of my body probed and prodded under brights lights in an ER now while cops watch and spend the next few hours questioning me.”
Murphy Jacobs
June 23, 2013 @ 10:19 am
Because this was my original statement, I’ll try to answer. And I stand by what I said.
It’s been stated over and over (most recently in a Slate review of the movie This is the End http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/06/21/this_is_the_end_rape_jokes_do_they_pass_the_rape_joke_litmus_test.html?wpisrc=flyouts) that our current rape sulture REQUIRES women to regard all men as potential rapists, to which men tend to react with “Hey! I’m not a rapist!” (Patton Oswalt’s blog post, referenced in the review, gives a great deconstruction of this idea). Being regarded in a particular way does not, obviously, mean the person so regarded must and does fulfill the expected/suspected behavior. So let’s separate that out.
Second, in one of the articles I linked in the original post, the rapist was a woman. So there is evidence that rape is not a male-only crime. Men are also victims of rape. People of all ages have committed sexual assaults (even children on other children). This is documented. Elderly people have committed rape. Rape is not restricted to a particular single act requiring particular genitalia. People have been raped with inanimate objects used by their rapists. There are even stories of rape by proxy, in which the person in power forces other people to sexual assault each other. When we discuss physical capacity, the number of individuals who are completely not capable of committing rape gets statistically small. We have to place a game of listing specifics.
And, of course, no one is immune from being a victim.
Rape is, after all — and this so often gets lost in discussion — an act of power using sex, not a sexual act in and of itself (which is revealed in the metaphorical use of the word “rape” in the English language — again, finding examples of this will not strain resources).
Perhaps I would have incited less reaction if I had phrased the idea as “a rapist can come from nearly any group of people, as can a rape victim”, but I chose to have impact rather than technical, grammatical accuracy. However, I still maintain my original statement (“…few, realistically, are totally incapable of committing an assault.”) I think it accurately stated my point in the way I wanted.
As others have stated, that you found my statement to be offensive is not a reflection of my statement, but of your interpretation and list of exceptions under your definition of “rapist”. As I suggested in my original post, such interpretations perhaps should be examined for what the exceptions are and how they fit in to the general as opposed to the personal experience of rape and rape culture.
Murphy Jacobs
June 23, 2013 @ 10:28 am
Well, there’s also the demonstrated fact that many — perhaps most — rapists commit multiple acts of rape. So one rapist can create a lot of damage…
Murphy Jacobs
June 23, 2013 @ 10:30 am
(sorry — “place” should be “play” as in “play a came of listing specifics”)
Murphy Jacobs
June 23, 2013 @ 1:11 pm
Succinct phrasing of a complex set of thoughts. Well done.
Damiana
June 23, 2013 @ 2:26 pm
Murphy, try thinking of it this way:
Suppose you were a soldier, stationed in a war zone where there was a LOT of guerrilla warfare. Now, MOST of the populace are not actually trying to kill you… but somewhere between 5 and 10 percent ARE, and a lot of the ones who are not, don’t see any problem with the ones who are, and tend to do things like help protect the ones who are, hide them, give them alibis, etc. And, of course, some of the ones who are guerrillas only kill maybe one or two of the people on your side, and some of them have a whole lot of kills.
Now suppose that there is literally no way to tell the difference between the ones who ARE trying to kill you, and the ones who are not, until they actually start trying to kill you.
What kind of mindset would you need to have in order to stay alive? Would you need to view each and every person you saw as potentially being one of the guerrillas, even though there was at least a 90% chance they weren’t?
Now, supppose some people started telling you they were terribly offended that you were thinking of them as potentially being killers, because after all, they say, THEY’RE not killers, and the REAL damage was being caused–to them–by your assumptions.
Would you think they had a point? Or would you think they were incredibly self-focused and more than a little crazy, and maybe wonder WHY they were trying so hard to get you and your fellow soldiers to drop your guard?
What would happen if you chose to give everyone you met the benefit of the doubt, even when they were being aggressive toward you, but hadn’t actually tried to kill you yet?
Damiana
June 23, 2013 @ 2:31 pm
Oh, and let’s add in to the mix:
One out of every six soldiers on your side has been killed by a guerrilla. And EVERY SINGLE SOLDIER you have ever met has been attacked by a guerrilla at least once, and usually several times.
Sally
June 23, 2013 @ 5:45 pm
I would like to staple this up everywhere. Some trolls may need it tattooed on by an enraged fire spider. Is that species-ist? So be it.
As a woman who sometimes uses a wheelchair, thanks. I can’t imagine how much more stressful that would be if I was also black and/or trans.
Murphy Jacobs
June 23, 2013 @ 6:10 pm
I’m not absolutely certain what you are addressing to me, Damiana, since it was my post and my saying that “and few, realistically, are totally incapable of committing an assault ” which offended the poster designated with “W”. I live in a culture that expects women to be primed always to the potential of rape, whereas most men are not required to think that way (although I have had male friends subjected to sexual assault). The whole idea that a woman must act to prevent ever ending up in a situation where she can be sexually assaulted is repugnant. My own experiences tell me this is untrue — the assaults I suffered didn’t happen at parties, or in dark alleys, and weren’t committed by strangers. The first happened when I was asleep in bed and I was three years old.
My original point was that no one is immune to sexual assault, that a rapist can be pretty much anyone you can name, and that it arises from our society/culture’s refusal to defend victims and accuse perpetrators.
Sallymander
June 27, 2013 @ 10:39 pm
I love my husband. I married my husband. He’s been my best friend since before we started dating, for over a decade now, and I hope many years to come.
I still had to explain to him what spousal rape was, and that “compromise” when one partner wanted sex and the other did not was not… having sex. It was rape.
It was an incredibly difficult conversation, and it still had to happen, because he honestly did not understand that having sex with me when I did not want to have sex, despite our relationship, was rape.
We are both outspoken activists in our area now, and he is big and tall and men happen to stop and listen to him when they’d shout over me. He will then say the exact same things I said, and when the person grudgingly agrees with him, will say, “That is exactly what my wife JUST SAID.” Which sucks, but I prefer it to nobody hearing the words at all. It’s amazing the changes you can make even in a group of friends if just one person starts listening and speaking with you.
Victor Greeson
July 2, 2013 @ 2:53 am
Megpie71 – This is so, so good, so succinct, and so accurate, that I had to take a moment out of tearing my hair out over everything else going on in this discussion to congratulate you for your sheer winningness. Please do more stuff like that.
Nathanael
August 15, 2013 @ 5:08 am
“rape culture is something you don’t learn about in school”
Well, y’know, actually, it can be. I learned about it when I was repeatedly sexually harassed (as in, genital grabbing) by a small number of other boys in middle school and almost (thankfully not quite) every teacher and most of the other students ignored it or minimized it or dismissed it.
(“You should have fought back more.” I did, jackasses. “You shouldn’t antagonize them.” I didn’t even know who they were when they started. “You should be taller.” WTF?)
But I don’t suppose that is what you meant by “learn about in school”. 🙁