Text, Subtext, and Pieced-Together Lives – Angelia Sparrow
Angelia Sparrow has done something in this essay I wouldn’t have thought possible — she made me want to go back and rewatch X-Men 3.
As I look ahead to the last batch of guest posts, I’m trying to decide whether to take another break before posting the rest. There’s a lot to process and think about in these things … what do you think?
Once upon a time—all the best stories start that way—once upon a time, there were no gay people on TV, except Billy Crystal on “Soap,” and certainly no lesbians. I joke that lesbians weren’t invented until the 1990s, and for all our pop-culture representation, we might as well not have been.
I grew up in the 70s and 80s, not a great time to be gay to start with. The world was starting to acknowledge we were real, but the plague lay sore upon the land, and “Unclean” was not an atypical reaction. Pastors were preaching against gay people with the same vigor they had recently discovered for abortion after school segregation became a toxic issue with their congregations.
I’m a middle-aged married byke now, with four kids, two of whom are bisexual. I had no clue when I was six why I wanted to be Batgirl, other than the motorcycle and long red hair and librarian and apartment of her own. Lesbians weren’t even mentioned, except Billie Jean King, and I couldn’t be an athlete. Add in a lot of the aforementioned bad religion, and my generation learned to hide.
My daughters got subtext and the occasional relationship, but they still didn’t see much of themselves in media. Willow and Tara on “Buffy” were one of the first lesbian couples on TV, and certainly the first we watched with the kids. Seeing my approval of that relationship helped my oldest daughter, Victoria, come out to me in 2005. But Willow went from “I’m with Oz” straight to “I’m with Tara” gay without even acknowledging the possibility of bisexuality. And that hurt. It felt like a glaring omission, a negation.
Victoria went through the same media I had, twenty years before. And the problem movies and “dead in the third reel” stuff depressed her and bored her. Xena and Gabrielle were the only characters she saw having relationships with both men and women. She wanted to know if she was going to have to die young.
About this time, George Takei came out. Victoria had a huge Sulu crush to start with, and seeing him as an old man, older than her grandfather, and knowing he was gay, reassured her she did not have to die before thirty. We started looking for other, older media figures who were out, and found a few. But again, almost all were gay. Bisexuality was not an obvious thing, and something very few admitted to.
My youngest, Olivia, saw subtext before she could read. She loved Smallville and would lie on my tummy on the couch and watch it. We watched season 3, episode 2, when Lex gives the deed to the Kent farm over. Her eyes got big and she watched Clark and Lex, and then announced, “Clark love him, Mommy!”
In 2006, we saw X-Men 3. The movie gets a lot of scorn, but for us, it was a real turning point. Remember, this was the year after the Summer of Zach. We had joined with the local community to protest Love In Action, a reparative therapy center, because of Zach Stark, a teenager who had been forced into its program and left a list of the rules on his MySpace, exposing it. Our local movie critic called X3’s mutant cure “Love in Action in a syringe.” We had figured out a long time ago that the X-Men franchise wasn’t really about mutants. So we went. Victoria and I came from the movie with different takeaways, but we both saw exactly what was happening in the real world on the screen.
The cure. The ordinary humans fighting us (this was the same year eight states passed anti-marriage amendments). The radicalization of more marginalized factions. It was all there, with more explosions than necessary. We started getting more involved in the community. I volunteered at the Gay and Lesbian Community Center. Victoria became active in the local youth group. And my fundamentalist husband joined PFLAG.
Now, almost a decade later, we still piece together the existence of bisexuals in the margins of our media. There are gay characters in almost every genre, and they’re no longer limited to minstrelry or villainy. But bisexuals are rarer and almost always female. Irene Adler on the BBC Sherlock is presented as bisexual, Sarah Lance on Arrow. The very pansexual Jack Harkness, Brittany on Glee. They do, however, exist.
There are out media personalities, and some identify as bisexual. And this, too helps. My youngest, now in her teens, dates boys and girls alike. She listens to Lady Gaga, enjoys Misha Collins on Supernatural (the first out poly star), and knows they’re bisexual. Her media world is very different from mine, and hopefully a more welcoming one.
Angelia Sparrow is the queer pagan liberal that Pat Robertson warned you about. She has been writing professionally since 2004, when she sold her first short story, “Prey,” to Torquere Press’ Monsters anthology. Since then she has published a dozen novels, with everyone from Ellora’s Cave to Storm Moon Press, and over eighty short stories. She writes SF/F/H, often with a queer bent.
Her work can be found at http://brooksandsparrow.com and she can be found at valarltd on livejournal, Pintrest and Tumblr and Angelia Sparrow on facebook.
josh jasper
March 14, 2015 @ 11:09 am
For the longest time I thought of myself as bisexual, but then trans and agendered people entered my life and it moved me to think of myself as pansexual because thinking of people participating the gender binary as just as validly attractive/romantic makes more sense.
I’m guessing that most bisexual identifying people have no problem with trans/agender attraction and romantic partners, but swapping a word “bisexual” with so much history might be difficult, or perhaps not even something you’d thought of.
I’m just asking people who identify as bi to think about it, and think about modifying what you call yourself to something more open. “Bi” operates in the gender binary. If you’re ever going to meet someone who operates outside of that and have potential romantic interest in them, calling yourself “bi” might tell them that you either don’t think they exist, or exclude them from consideration because you’re only interested in people inside the binary world.
Linn
March 14, 2015 @ 11:38 am
(Jim I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic of the post in question, but I do think this is important to address. Thank you for hosting these essays. They are fantastic.)
Josh, while I understand what you’re trying to say and fully agree that people need to reach outside the gender binary, the definition of bisexuality you state here is not a universal one. There are many cases of bisexuals (including myself) that do not use bisexuality to mean “men and women.” A very common alternate definition is to be attracted to genders both “the same and not” of one’s own. The Bi and Trans movements have a long history of being allies. The reasons an individual might prefer bisexual or pansexual are varied and change depending on what individual you ask. For example, I do not identify with pansexual because one of the definitions is “attracted regardless of gender” which feels too close to being “gender blind” to me personally. I think a person’s self identified gender is a very important part of their person and I do not want to negate that, so I find bisexuality a better fit for me personally. Of course, this definition of pansexuality is not universal either! I have a good friend who uses the term to mean that they are attracted to multiple genders but they reject the part of the definition that includes being gender blind. Some people prefer the bisexual term because of the longer history. Others prefer the pansexual one because it is a younger one and they feel it fits very much with their generation.
The choice is very much a specific one per person and the choice of a term really doesn’t indicate whether or not they include nonbinary genders.
Here are some links to bisexual organizations who use different definitions than “men and woman”:
http://www.biresource.net/waybeyondthebinary.shtml
http://www.open.ac.uk/ccig/files/ccig/The%20BisexualityReport%20Feb.2012.pdf
http://internationalspectrum.umich.edu/life/definitions
There are a lot more than that but those are the ones I have handy right now. Bisexuals and bisexuality do not inherently reinforce the gender binary nor exist only in the gender binary. It’s very important that misconception is shattered.
Colleen
March 14, 2015 @ 11:43 am
As an employee of the Bisexual Organizing Project, I can tell you that those conversations are very much happening, at least in our community. The question is how to retain the familiarity of the term while at the same time indicating inclusivity for all people who identify as non-monosexual. Most bisexual people I know do not, in fact, consider themselves attracted to only cis individuals.
Lenora Rose
March 14, 2015 @ 12:29 pm
I’m definitely pansexual if you want to consider “attracted to people regardless of gender, gender presentation or presence or absence on the binary” But I still find that if I say bisexual I have a lot easier time explaining my sexuality to the straight cis binary person on the street. I therefore use it more often — but I suspect if I were attracted to someone non-binary I’d try to make conscious use of pansexual because the circumstances would warrant it.
Lenora Rose
March 14, 2015 @ 12:30 pm
(attracted to or just discussing sexuality with, in fact.)
Jane Wells
March 14, 2015 @ 12:45 pm
Thank you, Jim, for hosting this series.
And thank you, Angelina, for writing.
Angelia Sparrow
March 14, 2015 @ 2:04 pm
I’m working on it. I’m in a casual relationship with a gender-queer sapiosexual.
It’s disconcerting when I am thinking “lesbian” to discover my partner thinks “queered straight.” I understand transitioning from one end of the binary to the other. I even understand hanging out in the middle, where gender fluidity is much like bisexuality.
But it’s still difficult to get my own head around. The best I can do is use the proper pronouns.
Bookewyrme
March 14, 2015 @ 2:20 pm
Thanks Jim for hosting this series again, I’ve been reading them all. But this one really resonates for me.
Growing up, I knew about homosexuality and gays and lesbians, even gender-queerness and trans people. I saw representations, and knew people with those identities. But I’d never even heard of bisexuality/pansexuality for a long time. I never saw them in my media (and when I did I usually missed it because it was implied not explicit and I’m sometimes bad at picking up clues). So when I started to kiss girls and enjoy looking at naked girly magazines (even had a year-long subscription to Playboy in college), I figured I was going through a “phase” or doing it “for attention” or something. Because I *knew* I wasn’t a lesbian. I still liked men, a lot. So this other thing would go away eventually. Right?
Anyway, long story short, I was TWENTY-FIVE and married before I finally realized my orientation and began to identify as bi. This has been horribly damaging. I feel cheated of the early experiences and explorations I could have had. I struggle all the time with feelings of being “not queer enough” and so do not reach out to the communities I could be a part of. And all because there is so little visibility of multi-sexuality that I didn’t even know you were allowed to be attracted to more than one gender at a time.
Bisexual invisibility is a real problem, and I’m glad it’s getting better, but it needs to get better faster, please. And not just implicitly but explicitly, because some of us are no good at subtext!
(Sorry for the novel in the comments section! :P)
Angelia Sparrow
March 14, 2015 @ 10:18 pm
I have been varying degrees of active in the local community. Start with your local QUILTBAG community center. There may be a group that meshes well with you.
And it is getting better, even in the last 10 years.
Nenya
March 28, 2015 @ 12:43 am
Just dropping in to lend my fistbump of bisexuality (bi woman married to a lesbian, here). And replying to your comment because of the part where you say you sometimes feel “not queer enough”–I think this is something a LOT of bi people struggle with. (As well as the “Am I really bi? Do I like men enough and women enough and nonbinary folks enough? Or am I just faking it?” Like literally every bisexual person I have known has run into this thought process. I feel like it’s almost part of what makes us bi, lol. That questioning.)
Anyway. From another person who took until her late twenties to realize she was bisexual, hi! 🙂