Options – Joie Young
Anyone know if there’s a good plugin for emphasizing pull quotes in a blog post? Because I’d love to be able to make lines like this stand out even more:
“That book – that wonderful, hidden, slim brown book – was a lifeline. It gave me the option to consider something other than the horrific status quo I was maintaining.”
Also, my thanks to Joie Young for mentioning xyr frustration with Dumbledore. I had mixed feelings about that revelation as well, but xe articulates it better than I’ve been able to.
I’ve got at least two more guest blog posts coming, but I’m still deciding which one to run next. So I guess you’ll just have to come back tomorrow to find out!
I couldn’t even tell you when I began to notice women. I have no memory of my first crush on a girl. I can look back and identify what would have been a crush if I had thought for a second that I could crush on a female, but I can’t tell you who it was or when it was or even why I crushed on her.
Because that simply wasn’t an option.
What I can tell you is the moment I first saw myself reflected in a book – not that I recognized it was me in that reflection. I was in high school. My literature class was working in the library on some sort of internet search worksheet. I had just completed the worksheet, so I scoured the bookshelves for something to read while the rest of the class completed it. The book I chose was literally on the bottom shelf in the back corner of the library. Honestly, I thought it was part of the reference section at first. The back cover introduced the book as a coming of age novel, and that seemed like a decent enough distraction. So, I went back to my desk and read.
I could not have known what I was getting into. This wasn’t just a coming of age novel. This was a close look at race, education, class, and sexuality. The main characters were black, poor, had insufficient resources at their school, and weren’t of the “traditional” sexualities. Now, I’m pretty lucky in this world. I’m white and middle class with parents who invested in my education from the start. I have so much privilege. But I’m also pan-sexual and non-binary. So, while much of the discussion in this book – oh how I wish I could remember the name of it! – was totally foreign to me, I still needed it in a way I would not be able to describe until years later. When the main character in the book, an aromantic girl, sees the boy she has convinced herself she has a crush on kiss another boy, the moment spoke to me.
The clarity of that moment – both in the book and my recognition of something familiar there – has often occurred to me in the years since. I finally came out when I was twenty-five, a short eighteen months ago, to a few friends. And I was terrified. Because when my family found out, and I wanted them to find out from me, how would they react? The boy in the book was so terrified of being found out. The girl felt so much shame, but she wasn’t sure why. Was it because of what she saw? Or what she felt? Or who he was?
The resolution of the book was the girl working things out in her own head. She re-extended the hand of friendship to the boy, who was relieved that she knew. She realized people were just people and that was nothing to be ashamed of. She became comfortable with her lack of romantic interest. It was an uplifting ending.
And it gave me courage a decade later. Maybe I shouldn’t be so scared (though I was). Maybe I should give people the opportunity to be amazing (and they were). Maybe I should be comfortable with myself (now I am). That book – that wonderful, hidden, slim brown book – was a lifeline. It gave me the option to consider something other than the horrific status quo I was maintaining.
There was another book, Faerie Wars by Herbie Brennan. This one I read about two years before I came out and two years after having fallen in love with a woman (not that I would admit it at the time). It was a revelation. First of all, because it was such a sensory book. The main character is a teenager and the descriptions are focused on concrete senses, especially touch and smell. It was like an adult author finally remembered what it was like to be a teenager – or at least how it was to be a teenager like me.
The second reason the book had such an impact was what was happening in the background. Henry Atherton, the young teenaged protagonist, was trying to understand his parents’ sudden divorce, as was his sister. And the parents were getting divorced because his mother had fallen in love with a woman. The reactions ranged the spectrum. Henry was shocked – his mom had, after all, married his father and had two children with him. Henry’s sister was flat-out in denial and spouting all the stereotypes about it being “a phase” and it not being “real” and how every woman “goes through this sort of thing.” Mr. Atherton was resigned and doing everything he could to keep the family as in tact as possible. He understood his wife no longer loved him and chose to move out. Mrs. Atherton acted as if nothing was wrong, as if she could make it all right by pretending nothing happened.
I haven’t read the book since I came out and began learning about representation (and how not all representation is good). It’s possible that the treatment of the situation is offensive. But at the time, I needed to see those multitudes of reactions. At the time, I needed an idea of what might happen when I came out (not that I would admit I thought I might be coming out in the near future). I needed to know that coming out – after years of silence – was an option. I needed to be told it wouldn’t kill my family or my friends and that there would be people who loved me at the end of that day. And oh, how there were.
Even now, out and happily so, I need those books. I cried when a character in one of my favorite series came out, in canon, as gay (I’m declining to mention the series as the book is barely four months old – I don’t want to spoil anyone). That was my greatest frustration with Dumbledore – we need, I need, canon representation. Those words in black and white have great meaning and hope. Often times, still, books are the support I do not get from the culture that told me for twenty plus years that my sexuality and self were not options.
If those words mean so much to me, I cannot fathom what they mean to those who don’t have all my privileges. Representation in art matters so much. I wouldn’t have known where to begin had I not had it. I would not have known that I had options.
And so, I fight when and how I can for representation. I get angry when people try to deny it. I feel hurt, too personally sometimes, when people say it’s not necessary. I cry when we get small, too tiny pieces of the pop-culture pie because at least there’s a piece for us. Sometimes, I honestly don’t know if those tears are of rage at the smallness or of joy at the existence. Sometimes, I know they’re both. We’ve got such a long way to go, so it’s especially important to me when celebrities and athletes and everyday people come out.
Because someone out there needs the option.
Joie Young is an aspiring author currently knee-deep in the editing process of xyr first manuscript. Xe spends most of xyr time steeped in faerie tales, mythology, and rodeo. Xe writes about writing here, tweets here, and – in general – enjoys being an avid fan of good literature, good TV, and good food. Books were xyr only advocates for many years, so xe is especially passionate about representation in literature.
Katie
February 26, 2014 @ 9:59 am
This may be a stupid question but how do you pronounce xe/xyr? When I read, I pronounce words in my head, so it always gives me trouble when I encounter a new word that I’m unfamiliar with.
Very powerful piece. Thanks for writing this, Joie, and thanks for posting this series, Jim.
Jim C. Hines
February 26, 2014 @ 10:05 am
I believe it’s pronounced with a “Z” sound, like “zee” and “zer.” I’m hoping someone with more knowledge will step in and either confirm or correct me on that, though.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 10:14 am
Since gender neutral pronouns are still relatively new, there’s no standardization – of word OR of pronunciation. A lot of people pronounce the ‘xe/xyr’ pronouns as if that x is a z (and there’s plenty of linguistic reason for that – they’re not wrong to do so). I prefer to pronounce that x as if it’s a ‘ks’ – so, “ksee” for “xe” and “ksir” for “xyr” as “zee” and “zir” sound too much, to me, like they’re trying to sound like he/her and being non-binary I’m NOT like he OR her. I’m different, and I’d rather be comfortable with that difference than try to hide behind language that makes it easier for people to dismiss the difference. Now, some people see the value in making trans culture as familiar to the hetero-normative culture as possible and I hear those arguments gladly. But ultimately, in my eyes, tolerance of difference won’t come unless we acknowledge that there is a difference.
Sorry for the essay in response to a fairly simple question. I love talking about language, especially how to use your language for self-advocacy (I could write a whole ‘nother blog on how language is used repressively). Thank you, Katie, for taking the time to read my piece (and your kind words) and for wanting to understand.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 10:16 am
Thank you, Jim, for giving me a space to speak. I am over-whelmed.
Jim C. Hines
February 26, 2014 @ 10:18 am
Thank you for the essay response! 🙂
Jim C. Hines
February 26, 2014 @ 10:19 am
Me too. You and the rest of the guest bloggers have been amazing. Thank you!
Michi Trota (@GeekMelange)
February 26, 2014 @ 10:21 am
This is a lovely and powerful piece of writing. Thank you for sharing it, Joie. Also, totally dig the hair!
betsy dornbusch
February 26, 2014 @ 10:42 am
Thanks for writing, Joie. I especially like your comment about people being small. I believe prejudice is often about trying to make our big, scary world smaller. They just don’t recognize is how scary it is for everyone, and how rewarding it is to be really brave. I hope you get every reward for being so brave. 🙂
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 10:45 am
Thank you, for both compliments. It’s been a pleasure to share and see people respond.
betsy dornbusch
February 26, 2014 @ 11:02 am
and by brave, I mean simply being yourself!
Carol
February 26, 2014 @ 11:49 am
Actually, no. They’ve been around for a while. Trust mathematicians to do it right. 😎
Wendy Cholbi
February 26, 2014 @ 11:49 am
A quick response to Jim’s question about pull quotes:
WordPress has a built-in Blockquote feature, and your theme, Atahualpa, allows you to style these blockquotes however you like (the settings are in Appearance –> Atahualpa Theme Options –> Various Content Items –> Style BLOCKQUOTES). Whatever you put in this field (yes, it’s CSS, but there is a default style that you can tweak) is automatically applied to any text in a WP page/post that you highlight and apply the Blockquote style to (the button that has a large double-quotation mark on it, next to the buttons for bulleted and numbered lists).
Apologies if you already know this, of course! It looks like you’ve emphasized quotes in previous blog posts by indenting them, but the Blockquote feature lets you add a border, background color, different font size, and whatever other styles you’d like, without having to install a plugin.
Jim C. Hines
February 26, 2014 @ 12:05 pm
Thanks, Wendy! I’ll check that out!
K.M. Herkes
February 26, 2014 @ 12:12 pm
Thank you for this. Thank you.
That resonance when you first see yourself in the written word is precious and powerful. A throwaway passage in Cordelia’s Honor by Lois McMaster Bujold yanked on something so deep inside me when I read it that I called my husband and read half the chapter to him over the phone, laughing and crying. (A character is smeared as bisexual, implying infidelity/perversity, and his partner says basically, “Oh, he’s monogamous first.”) Having my staid hetero-normative relationship validated doesn’t compare to the trials that others face, I know, I do, but my pain is real when others dismiss me as “not real” because I’m married. And people do, oh, yes.
Joie, I can’t wait to read your book when you’re done, and I hope you grab a great big piece of pop-culture pie. Seeing ourselves in stories is transcendent. It lifts us into the light where we see that we are possible. That we are real. That we can all be heroes. Sexuality doesn’t squish well into tiny cultural boxes, and its messy, sticky wonderful complexity deserves to be portrayed in fiction in all its variety.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 12:56 pm
Thank heaven for Elverson and Spivak – when I was first figuring out what pronouns I wanted to use, those were extremely helpful. When I said “relatively new,” I really did mean “relative.” 1975, when Elverson showed up, isn’t all that long ago, considering Modern English started in the mid 1500’s. This “newness” is compounded by the fact that there is no standardization for the non-binary pronouns. There are so many options that no one system has gained prominence, and therefore there’s been no cultural agreement. Forty years is a minuscule time period, in regards to cultural and linguistic shifts. And it’s harder to shift when there’s no one direction.
But yeah – mathematicians totally got it down before the rest of us did. 😀
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 1:01 pm
I LOVE your interpretation of that phrase. That is not what I meant when I wrote it, but I love that that is what you saw. It gives a different meaning, and I like it. Thank you. It’s much easier to be brave when people are so kind.
Michael M. Jones
February 26, 2014 @ 1:09 pm
When I see such lovely, articulate, meaningful posts, it helps to remind me how important it is that we all fight for diversity and variety in literature. When I do a companion anthology to Scheherazade’s Facade, I’ll try to include more stories which are non-binary as well as the ones which explore trans and other gender issues.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 1:09 pm
The presumption of deviance in non-normative sexualities is one of the tropes I LOATHE the most. It’s so firmly ingrained itself in the collective conscious that my own mother, who knows and loves me, struggled with it when I came out (and all the years before, she just didn’t confront it before then). And the assumption that bi- or pan-sexuality is somehow negated when you fall in love with a culturally accepted partner is another one of glasses of kool-aid I’d LOVE to permanently empty. I’m going to have to look at Cordelia’s Honor, thanks for the rec, and I’m so glad you’ve seen yourself and found that joy of being possible. We ARE and it is wonderful.
The book, well, it’s coming. But it WILL contain more of that pie, for anyone who wants it. Thank you for your encouragement.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 1:15 pm
Thank you – for your compliments and your willingness to include. And I would love to see more non-binary and trans stories. Count me in as a reader!
Michael M. Jones
February 26, 2014 @ 1:18 pm
If you haven’t already picked up a copy of the aforementioned Scheherazade’s Facade, I’d be happy to send you an electronic copy. 🙂
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 1:39 pm
Please? I’d love that. What you need?
Michael M. Jones
February 26, 2014 @ 1:44 pm
Just drop me a note at facadeantho at gmail.com with your preferred email address and choice of formats. It’s that easy. 🙂
Michael M. Jones
February 26, 2014 @ 1:54 pm
I’d been thinking, we really do need some sort of standard set of gender neutral pronouns… if just because the sooner people agree on what to use, the sooner everyone can work on getting the pronouns into common and accepted usage. There’s nothing wrong with a plurality of options, except that us silly hetero-normative types need to know where to start learning. I’ve seen they/them/their, ze/zie/sie and zir, and even glancing at Wikipedia offers a dozen different options. I’m glad when gender-neutral or gender-fluid folks state upfront what they prefer, so we can respect that choice. 🙂 (Like you, language fascinates me. But English frustrates me because while we’ve mugged everyone else and taken the best words, it still falls short on something like this!)
I wish I could peek into the future and see which words come out on top.
Katie
February 26, 2014 @ 1:58 pm
Thanks for the quick reply. It’s an easy thing for me to add a couple of pronouns into my vocabulary. It always struck me as weird that some people seemed to care more about “purity” of language than about people they might be hurting by refusing to allow that language might evolve.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 2:21 pm
No problem! And thank you for being one of the people who are willing to evolve, both linguistically and personally. A few little words are a HUGE help, more than a lot of people know.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 2:27 pm
I, personally, hate “they” – but that seems the standard the culture is swinging towards. A standard set would be nice, but that’s going to take a lot of discussion and dust-settling before it happens. Also, there will always be someone who doesn’t conform to the standard. I think being upfront about which set you prefer might be the best solution.
Lexica
February 26, 2014 @ 4:29 pm
oh how I wish I could remember the name of it!
Ask Metafilter is often amazing at identifying “what was this book I vaguely remember?” questions. (A few examples: AskMe questions tagged “book”) If you’re interested, Joie, I’d be glad to post a question about it on your behalf. (lexica510 at gmail if you want to reach me)
Allison
February 26, 2014 @ 4:57 pm
I think I know which recent popular series you’re referring to in which a main character canonically came out. I am straight and cisgendered and (if I’m right about what book you’re referring to) that was a very powerful scene for me. I can only imagine how powerful it was for someone who has had to worry their whole lives about what would happen if they were outed or came out.
Pam Adams
February 26, 2014 @ 5:57 pm
Could the book be Boy Proof? There’s a list of Asexual YA fiction here.
http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/44480.Asexuality_in_YA_Fiction
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 6:13 pm
Unfortunately, no. The book was easily ten to twenty years old when I read it ten years ago (which made it all the more exceptional in my memory). But, I LOVE that that Goodreads list exists and will be making my way through it as soon as I’ve the time! Thank you!
Sally
February 26, 2014 @ 6:35 pm
I, personally, like the xe/xir (or whichever someone chooses) non-binary pronouns here on teh intarwebs. You REALLY can’t tell someone’s gender from their electrons, and often “they” is just so ungrammatical I can’t bring myself to type it. And “one” is so cold and theoretical. And it’s embarrassing for everyone when it’s wrong.
So when I am communicating to and about another human, it’s useful to be able to say “If I understand BlogPerson correctly, zie meant to say that it would bother zir if that happened.” Then BlogPerson may say that zie wishes to be addressed as he, she, xe, they, or whatever.
It also shortens up the sentence not to have to type “he/she/they”.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 7:25 pm
That scene was heart-breaking because it acknowledged how cruel Love’s arrows can be. I put down the book, crying very real tears of joy at the canon character, but also clutching my chest because of the events and HATRED he had for himself. (That should be enough clues to confirm if we’re on the same page or not.) I’m very glad it was powerful for you. I think one of the most important things we can do is realize that just because someone is not like us doesn’t mean their experiences of things aren’t relatable. I’m non-binary and pan, but I can relate to the heart-break of a cis boy or the joy of a gay girl or the fear of rejection of a trans straight man! These are human emotions, they don’t belong to just one group. And, if that was culturally recognized, that would destroy that particular phenomenally stupid argument against representation in a flat second.
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 7:28 pm
Thank you! That’s an awesome idea!
Joie
February 26, 2014 @ 7:36 pm
I don’t like “they” for grammar, but more because I find it more “other”-ing than “it,” even. They pushes people away (they are like that, but no one else is) and indicates a plurality that, at least for me, is not there. And I do like gender neutral pronouns for the SAME reason. It GENUINELY simplifies things. Why do people fight it?
Beth b.
February 26, 2014 @ 10:26 pm
Thank you Joie for a very thought provoking post. Having a blended family of 2 gay and 4 straight siblings I have just a little experience caring for people different than myself….who’ve brought wonderful partners and a variety of friends into my life. Really can’t imagine or extrapolate some of your struggles and challenges in this world but love to read books with all kinds of characters, both like and unlike myself. If you have any other book recommendations I’m all ears. Also, thank you, Jim, I have enjoyed each one of your guest bloggers very much.
Michael M. Jones
February 27, 2014 @ 2:55 am
I’m glad you said that. I feel the same way… 40 years of social conditioning prompts me to think of “they” as impersonal rather than personal, plural rather than singular, and just doesn’t come naturally when I’m attempting to talk with/to/about those genderfluid folks I know who prefer it. I’m all in favor of whatever simplifies things and gives us a good starting point. I actually envy those languages which have set rules which address the topic in one fashion or another. 🙂
Michael M. Jones
February 27, 2014 @ 2:56 am
Can you drop a hint? I’m all kinds of curious, and this sounds like something to check out if it turns out I haven’t read it already. 🙂
Allison
February 27, 2014 @ 11:20 am
Yep, Joie, that’s the book I was thinking of. I listen to those books on CD while I drive and I was clutching the steering wheel in a death grip during that scene. I’m lucky I didn’t crash!
Michael, I will rot13 the name of the book and series for you. Go to rot13.com and copy/paste what I’ve typed below into the box exactly how it appears, then click “cypher” to read it. That way no one will be spoiled unless they want to be.
The book is:
Gur Ubhfr bs Unqrf, obbx 4 bs gur Urebrf bs Bylzchf frevrf ol Evpx Evbeqna.
Michael M. Jones
February 27, 2014 @ 1:00 pm
Yes! That series! That book made me so happy. 🙂 It was such a great moment of revelation.
Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt
February 27, 2014 @ 3:30 pm
For quotes I’ve been using Quozio.com – you type your text in and it offers a bunch of styles. I copy the image and paste it into my blog posts.
I believe Joel Friedman had a post on a whole bunch of similar sites, but I can’t find it.
You don’t even have to join. There is also a bit of Java you can put in your bookmarks which makes the applet (?) always ready.
Sally
February 27, 2014 @ 5:43 pm
They and Them are usually bad people, not just others.
Lise
February 28, 2014 @ 12:01 am
You might want to try https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/61456.Asexuals_In_Fiction_ instead. It’s longer and more accurate (although it does branch out from YA). Boy Proof was new to me and I was excited to see other unread books on this list only to look into them further and find that half the list has no asexual characters after all 🙁
Lenora Rose
February 28, 2014 @ 9:38 am
I use the singular “They ” when I’m talking about a generic theoretical person, but it feels very clunky and unnatural when talking about a specific person*. “When a writer is trying to include diversity, they are not ‘selling out'” feels more appropriate than “This is Chris, they like snowboarding and they write the most awesome Transformers fanfic.”
* it should go without saying that I will use it if the person themselves uses it and requests its use.
Joie
February 28, 2014 @ 11:34 pm
Oooh, thanks! Hopefully, more non-binary characters (and a list for them) will show up, too.
Joie
February 28, 2014 @ 11:39 pm
Thank you for your kindness. As for books with a LGBT lead that AREN’T defined by that, I whole-heartedly recommend Digital Divide by K.B. Spangler. It’s science fiction set in a parallel universe to ours in which the US government has created an agency of cyborgs. Agent Rachel Peng is the liason to the DC Metro Police and she is BADASS. She’s phenomenal. I love her. It’s a mystery novel with some conspiracy and social justice thrown in. Oh, also, Rachel is blind. She uses her cyborgery to compensate in some ways, but the reality is, she cannot see. And Spangler is really good at making that part of the character, not the character. Seriously, if there is a book for me to recommend, it is that one.
Joie
February 28, 2014 @ 11:42 pm
That’s certainly how I feel, but then there’s the author of today’s guest post – “they/them” seems to work for them. Everyone is different and the wonderful thing about pronouns is how we can use them to describe our experience.
mt2q
March 1, 2014 @ 6:37 pm
What really makes me happy is seeing writers include things like sexual orientation, disability, whatever in secondary characters in a matter-of-fact way. For example, I just finished a book where two characters are talking about possibly being sent home and one man says to the other “at least you have a guy back home you’ll be happy to see.” It’s not done as a Big Deal, just a throw-away line, making it NORMAL. I think it’s progress when minorities aren’t just main characters and when whatever makes them “difference” just is part of them, not there to provide the message of the day.
Joie
March 3, 2014 @ 2:14 pm
Very much this, too. I LOVE references that are so small you might miss them if you didn’t read carefully, too. So long as we get MCs AND secondaries.
Jim C Hines series on Equity
March 3, 2014 @ 3:15 pm
[…] Options – Joie Young […]
Invisible: an anthology edited by Jim C Hines
March 3, 2014 @ 3:27 pm
[…] Options – Joie Young […]
Bruce Arthurs
March 4, 2014 @ 12:58 am
Bookdesigner.com had a recent article offering numerous resources for embellished pullquotes: http://www.thebookdesigner.com/2014/01/rj-adams/