How to Report Sexual Harassment, by Elise Matthesen
July 7 Update: Per Patrick Nielsen Hayden, an editor with Tor, James Frenkel is no longer with Tor Books.
ETA: Elise has said she’s comfortable with the following comment being shared. “My name is Sigrid Ellis. I was one of the co-hosts of the party Elise mentions. The person Elise reported for harassment is James Frenkel.” (Source)
I am beyond furious.
In 2010, in response to a series of specific incidents involving an editor in the community, I posted a list of resources for Reporting Sexual Harassment in SF/F. A number of people made reports about this individual.
I thought those reports had made a difference. I was wrong.
What follows is an account and essay from Elise Matthesen describing the process of reporting an incident that took place this year at Wiscon. While I’m not in a position to name names on my blog, I will say that the individual in question is the same one I was hearing about in 2010.
I ended up speaking to this person a while after I wrote that original blog post. He seemed genuinely contrite and regretful. I thought … I hoped … that he had learned, and that he would change his behavior.
I was wrong.
From what I’ve learned, nothing changed. Because the reports weren’t “formally documented,” this person was able to go on to harass other women.
Please read Elise’s essay. I’ve bolded one section about filing a formal report. If you’re aware of the situation and want to do so, I’ll be happy to do whatever I can to help hook you up with the appropriate contacts.
My thanks to Elise for her relentless work on this.
#
We’re geeks. We learn things and share, right? Well, this year at WisCon I learned firsthand how to report sexual harassment. In case you ever need or want to know, here’s what I learned and how it went.
Two editors I knew were throwing a book release party on Friday night at the convention. I was there, standing around with a drink talking about Babylon 5, the work of China Mieville, and Marxist theories of labor (like you do) when an editor from a different house joined the conversation briefly and decided to do the thing that I reported. A minute or two after he left, one of the hosts came over to check on me. I was lucky: my host was alert and aware. On hearing what had happened, he gave me the name of a mandated reporter at the company the harasser was representing at the convention.
The mandated reporter was respectful and professional. Even though I knew them, reporting this stuff is scary, especially about someone who’s been with a company for a long time, so I was really glad to be listened to. Since the incident happened during Memorial Day weekend, I was told Human Resources would follow up with me on Tuesday.
There was most of a convention between then and Tuesday, and I didn’t like the thought of more of this nonsense (there’s a polite word for it!) happening, so I went and found a convention Safety staffer. He asked me right away whether I was okay and whether I wanted someone with me while we talked or would rather speak privately. A friend was nearby, a previous Guest of Honor at the convention, and I asked her to stay for the conversation. The Safety person asked whether I’d like to make a formal report. I told him, “I’d just like to tell you what happened informally, I guess, while I figure out what I want to do.”
It may seem odd to hesitate to make a formal report to a convention when one has just called somebody’s employer and begun the process of formally reporting there, but that’s how it was. I think I was a little bit in shock. (I kept shaking my head and thinking, “Dude, seriously??”) So the Safety person closed his notebook and listened attentively. Partway through my account, I said, “Okay, open your notebook, because yeah, this should be official.” Thus began the formal report to the convention. We listed what had happened, when and where, the names of other people who were there when it happened, and so forth. The Safety person told me he would be taking the report up to the next level, checked again to see whether I was okay, and then went.
I had been nervous about doing it, even though the Safety person and the friend sitting with us were people I have known for years. Sitting there, I tried to imagine how nervous I would have been if I were twenty-some years old and at my first convention. What if I were just starting out and had been hoping to show a manuscript to that editor? Would I have thought this kind of behavior was business as usual? What if I were afraid that person would blacklist me if I didn’t make nice and go along with it? If I had been less experienced, less surrounded by people I could call on for strength and encouragement, would I have been able to report it at all?
Well, I actually know the answer to that one: I wouldn’t have. I know this because I did not report it when it happened to me in my twenties. I didn’t report it when it happened to me in my forties either. There are lots of reasons people might not report things, and I’m not going to tell someone they’re wrong for choosing not to report. What I intend to do by writing this is to give some kind of road map to someone who is considering reporting. We’re geeks, right? Learning something and sharing is what we do.
So I reported it to the convention. Somewhere in there they asked, “Shall we use your name?” I thought for a millisecond and said, “Oh, hell yes.”
This is an important thing. A formal report has a name attached. More about this later.
The Safety team kept checking in with me. The coordinators of the convention were promptly involved. Someone told me that since it was the first report, the editor would not be asked to leave the convention. I was surprised it was the first report, but hey, if it was and if that’s the process, follow the process. They told me they had instructed him to keep away from me for the rest of the convention. I thanked them.
Starting on Tuesday, the HR department of his company got in touch with me. They too were respectful and took the incident very seriously. Again I described what, where and when, and who had been present for the incident and aftermath. They asked me if I was making a formal report and wanted my name used. Again I said, “Hell, yes.”
Both HR and Legal were in touch with me over the following weeks. HR called and emailed enough times that my husband started calling them “your good friends at HR.” They also followed through on checking with the other people, and did so with a promptness that was good to see.
Although their behavior was professional and respectful, I was stunned when I found out that mine was the first formal report filed there as well. From various discussions in person and online, I knew for certain that I was not the only one to have reported inappropriate behavior by this person to his employer. It turned out that the previous reports had been made confidentially and not through HR and Legal. Therefore my report was the first one, because it was the first one that had ever been formally recorded.
Corporations (and conventions with formal procedures) live and die by the written word. “Records, or it didn’t happen” is how it works, at least as far as doing anything official about it. So here I was, and here we all were, with a situation where this had definitely happened before, but which we had to treat as if it were the first time — because for formal purposes, it was.
I asked whether people who had originally made confidential reports could go ahead and file formal ones now. There was a bit of confusion around an erroneous answer by someone in another department, but then the person at Legal clearly said that “the past is past” is not an accurate summation of company policy, and that she (and all the other people listed in the company’s publicly-available code of conduct) would definitely accept formal reports regardless of whether the behavior took place last week or last year.
If you choose to report, I hope this writing is useful to you. If you’re new to the genre, please be assured that sexual harassment is NOT acceptable business-as-usual. I have had numerous editors tell me that reporting harassment will NOT get you blacklisted, that they WANT the bad apples reported and dealt with, and that this is very important to them, because this kind of thing is bad for everyone and is not okay. The thing is, though, that I’m fifty-two years old, familiar with the field and the world of conventions, moderately well known to many professionals in the field, and relatively well-liked. I’ve got a lot of social credit. And yet even I was nervous and a little in shock when faced with deciding whether or not to report what happened. Even I was thinking, “Oh, God, do I have to? What if this gets really ugly?”
But every time I got that scared feeling in my guts and the sensation of having a target between my shoulder blades, I thought, “How much worse would this be if I were inexperienced, if I were new to the field, if I were a lot younger?” A thousand times worse. So I took a deep breath and squared my shoulders and said, “Hell, yes, use my name.” And while it’s scary to write this now, and while various people are worried that parts of the Internet may fall on my head, I’m going to share the knowledge — because I’m a geek, and that’s what we do.
So if you need to report this stuff, the following things may make it easier to do so. Not easy, because I don’t think it’s gotten anywhere near easy, but they’ll probably help.
NOTES: As soon as you can, make notes on the following:
- what happened
- when it happened and where
- who else was present (if anyone)
- any other possibly useful information
And take notes as you go through the process of reporting: write down who you talk with in the organization to which you are reporting, and when.
ALLIES: Line up your support team. When you report an incident of sexual harassment to a convention, it is fine to take a friend with you. A friend can keep you company while you make a report to a company by phone or in email. Some allies can help by hanging out with you at convention programming or parties or events, ready to be a buffer in case of unfortunate events — or by just reminding you to eat, if you’re too stressed to remember. If you’re in shock, please try to tell your allies this, and ask for help if you can.
NAVIGATION: If there are procedures in place, what are they? Where do you start to make a report and how? (Finding out might be a job to outsource to allies.) Some companies have current codes of conduct posted on line with contact information for people to report harassment to. Jim Hines posted a list of contacts at various companies a while ago. Conventions should have a safety team listed in the program book. Know the difference between formal reports and informal reports. Ask what happens next with your report, and whether there will be a formal record of it, or whether it will result in a supervisor telling the person “Don’t do that,” but will be confidential and will not be counted formally.
REPORTING FORMALLY: This is a particularly important point. Serial harassers can get any number of little talking-to’s and still have a clear record, which means HR and Legal can’t make any disciplinary action stick when formal reports do finally get made. This is the sort of thing that can get companies really bad reputations, and the ongoing behavior hurts everybody in the field. It is particularly poisonous if the inappropriate behavior is consistently directed toward people over whom the harasser has some kind of real or perceived power: an aspiring writer may hesitate to report an editor, for instance, due to fear of economic harm or reprisal.
STAY SAFE: You get to choose what to do, because you’re the only one who knows your situation and what risks you will and won’t take. If not reporting is what you need to do, that’s what you get to do, and if anybody gives you trouble about making that choice to stay safe, you can sic me on them. Me, I’ve had a bunch of conversations with my husband, and I’ve had a bunch of conversations with other people, and I hate the fact that I’m scared that there might be legal wrangling (from the person I’d name, not the convention or his employer) if I name names. But after all those conversations, I’m not going to. Instead, I’m writing the most important part, about how to report this, and make it work, which is so much bigger than one person’s distasteful experience.
During the incident, the person I reported said, “Gosh, you’re lovely when you’re angry.” You know what? I’ve been getting prettier and prettier.
Qwui
July 29, 2013 @ 11:06 pm
[This comment has mysteriously vanished, leaving nothing but the faintly echoing sound of belching goblins.]
Jonathon Side
July 30, 2013 @ 12:10 am
The way I figure it, there are two likely motives for demanding details. One is defending a friend. Loyalty’s a commendable trait, but this kind of issue is something that you should focus on supporting him directly rather than going to bat for him. Because, honestly, scrambling to find any justification or misconstruing on the part of the victim is actually contemptible.
The other is seeking validation. “Did he do something I might have done? Am I going to be accused of harassment by someone?”… and that, really, is either absolutely paranoid, or the talk of harassment is cutting close to the bone.
Either way, as said above, we do not need details. We are not entitled to them.
But I can tell you what we do know, what Ms Matthesen said at the end of her post.
We know that he knew he made her angry. Even if we believe he acted innocently and was misunderstood, we know that he was aware she was upset.
And we know that he was unrepentant. He did not apologise or try to clarify.
Instead, he mocked her.
He made fun of her.
He dismissed her.
If you need to know more than that, you’re a disgrace of a human being. If you’re ever in trouble, I hope the people around you show more sympathy than you’ve shown Ms Matthesen, because you have shown none.
Eric M. Van
July 30, 2013 @ 12:55 am
I was glad that Jim addressed the issue of folks wanting to know the details of the original incident, because we’ve had a lot of that. But I’m going to cut those people some slack, because I think that that desire is culturally normative, for reasons I’ll explain momentarily. And perhaps this explanation will educate them as to why it’s not appropriate in this case, or ones similar to it.
I think that when there is an accusation of bad behavior, followed by some sort of Authoritative ruling, we have a natural tendency to want to know the details *in order to make up our own minds.* In general, this is a Good Thing. And the reason it’s a good thing is that the Authorities have a very bad track record at ruling correctly, and ought to be questioned. Juries need to make psychologically and forensically expert evaluations of testimony and evidence, but they are no better at doing so than *any twelve people you could pick at random.” Oh, wait. [Rant on the idiocy of the jury system omitted, but didn’t I just say enough?] Internal investigations by institutions are routinely biased in favor of their own, sometimes egregiously so. So we always like to know the details ourselves. Did the jury get it wrong? Did the company ignore the evidence against their employee?
In this case, we had a witnessed incident, which was reported to corporate HR, which ruled against the employee despite their expected bias in his favor. Do we need to know the details in order to “make up our own minds”? I can understand the natural desire to want to do so, but in this instance it seems clear that the authoritative ruling can be trusted rather than questioned.
And finally, as I suggested earlier and Jonathan states more clearly, Frenkel’s odious final comment is completely consistent with someone who had just in fact been guilty of harassment, and would be out of character for anyone whose behavior had actually been *inadvertently* offensive.
Jonathon Side
July 30, 2013 @ 1:20 am
In light of Eric’s response I should probably clarify: I don’t think being curious about the details is a bad thing, necessarily. Anyone who says ‘Oooh, um, I don’t know which side to believe, I need more information’ is not a bad person, and not who I was talking to.
I was talking to the people who _DEMAND_ the details, who act as though the lack of detail is somehow damning evidence against Ms Matthesen herself.
Curiosity and wanting to make up your own mind is not a sin.
Qwui
July 31, 2013 @ 12:26 pm
[“Jig, tell Golaka to heat up the stewpot. Despite being told to stop commenting, Qwui’s back!”
“I don’t know, Braf. I got indigestion something fierce the last time we ate one of Qwui’s comments. I’m likely to ruin my loincloth…”]
Melissa
August 25, 2013 @ 8:02 pm
Geri, I admire you, both for being honest and for believing this about someone you wouldn’t have expected it of.
Needless to say, I admire Elise tremendously. Having passed 55, I don’t have to deal with this kind of crap any more. That said, it wasn’t long ago that I was looking for a relationship and trying really hard not to write guys off as “too nerdy” or “too earnest”, but I eventually got tired of talking myself blue in the face and not being taken seriously. I would be honest about what I wanted to happen how I expected to be treated and it was as if I hadn’t said a thing. I’m satisfied with being single now– I’d rather be in a relationship, but it’s just not worth it.
Geri Sullivan
August 25, 2013 @ 9:40 pm
Thank you, Melissa.
Alas, experience has demonstrated that passing 55 isn’t a universal protector against sexual harassment. I hope it at least continues to work that way for you.