Nobody’s Sidekick: Intersectionality in Protagonists – S. L. Huang
Thank you to everyone for the supportive comments and response to this first week of guest posts. I’m especially grateful to the writers for sharing such powerful, personal, and important stories. My plan is to take a week off, then come back with the next round of posts, just to break things up a little.
S. L. Huang addresses a common problem of representation: the idea that straying from the mainstream by more than one axis is too much, too implausible…especially for a protagonist. You can’t be too “different,” because you’ll knock readers out of the story.
Thank you, S. L. Huang, for dismantling that argument so well.
I’m a tangled intersection of underrepresented (female, nonwhite, queer, among others). Even before I had the vocabulary to express it, even before I had the self-awareness to acknowledge it, I remember always looking for people “like me” in media.
That’s not too surprising, is it?
It’s that same twinge of relating one feels when, say, seeing a nerd character who gets to be awesome in a story. I was always looking for those. But I also related to people who matched my identity in other ways—women, Asians, children of immigrants, people who struggled with their own inherited culture. And the older I got, and the more I gravitated toward science fiction and fantasy, the more it happened that the characters I related most to were always the side characters. The support. The ones who never got enough time for their own stories … or whose stories flat-out weren’t told.
I used to think this was just a product of my own preferences being off-beat. But over time I began to realize that the more dimensions of my identity a character matched, the further she was relegated from being a main character. From being important, a hero who would take the helm and drive the story into its own world’s legend.
It started to feel wrong, a piece of reality that kept wobbling like a busted chair leg.
#
I sometimes call intersectionality “the problem of Star Trek captains.” We’ve had five series-leading captains: Kirk (white, male, American), Picard (white, male, European), Sisko (black, male, American), Janeway (white, female, American), and Archer (white, male, American). Not a single one differs in more than a single category from white, male, American.
When I was a teenager, I wrote a piece of Star Trek fanfiction with a captain who was female, half-human-Chinese-from-China, and half-Trill. And I wondered, as my teenaged self, why a series about a globalized Earth—one known for challenging barriers, no less—hadn’t had a similar one. The question made me itch under my skin in a way I couldn’t articulate at the time.
#
“Nobody is a sidekick in their own life,” the saying goes, and growing up I’d never felt like one. In high school, I was bright, precocious, super excited about learning absolutely anything, and excessively opinionated. I never doubted I deserved a seat at the table.
Until I grew up. Gradually, the juxtaposition of my accomplishments with my intersectionality have begun giving me frissons of unreality, as if I’m a monkey playing the piano. I imagine I’m in a book or a movie seeing the moment my character is established: The only girl in the math seminar … who is also nonwhite and queer and will save the world! The woman who outshoots all the men … who is also the Asian-American daughter of an immigrant and will be our Chosen Protagonist! And I’m jolted out of the scene, the bulwark of traditional culture whispering “unrealistic” in my ear.
And I’m not the only one who’s been the girl in the math seminar, or the woman who can outshoot all the men. Not even close. My best mathematician friend is a woman who’s smarter than I am, and the last time I taught shooting the most advanced marksman was a markswoman who’d moved to the U.S. from Japan. There are lots of us, and we all kick more than enough ass to lead our own stories. The lack of fictional counterparts in SFFdom … it’s frustrating, and it sometimes makes me feel desperately lonely.
And angry.
And lonely.
Over and over, I’m constantly reminded that the mere fact of my existence is too brash and unusual and radical to be believable as a hero. In SFF worlds, where it seems every lead character is Extraordinary and Chosen and Destined … simply being born on more than one real-life minority axis is a bridge too far.
#
“I’ll be your ethnic sidekick,” I said to my white friend, when she and I were planning to put together a webseries. I said it with a laugh and an eyeroll, in the way one does when one wants to mock something but is still too hesitant to challenge it. Serious-not-serious, funny-not-funny.
“Nah, nobody’s a sidekick,” my friend said. “We’re both too awesome.”
I will always love her for that.
#
When I started the brainstorming process for what would eventually become my debut novel, I initially assumed I’d write my mathematically-superpowered lead character as a man. Probably a white man. Because … well, because. Something-something-mumble-blah about me being a nonwhite woman, and if I wrote my first lead as a nonwhite woman, no matter how different she was from me, wouldn’t that feel too contrived?
Because people from more than one underrepresented demographic are contrived.
Choosing to make my protagonist not only a woman, but a woman of color, felt … daring. Dangerous. Like people would find fault in her just for that. Not for any failures in writing or character, but for daring to exist, as a nonwhite woman leading her own story.
For existing.
I’m sitting here reading the history of my own thoughts and starting to cry. Because how many times have I looked at the television, or books, or movies, and wanted to scream, “I exist!”
I am the protagonist in my own life, in my own story. I am not anybody’s sidekick.
Neither are my characters. Neither are they.
I have now, thankfully, gotten over the knee-jerk reaction that every axis I assign to a character off the straight white able-bodied American male (etc) is somehow an additional layer of disbelief I’m asking my audience to suspend. That I must justify these choices. If I ever feel that urge, I remind myself I am a perfectly realistic person, someone whose birth needed no special reason.
And I do not need anyone’s permission to be a hero.
So I’m going to continue writing my main characters as nonwhite and female and queer and disabled and nonbinary and non-neurotypical and non-Western as I want, and cross these demographics with each other as much as I want, and make my characters drive their own stories just as much as I drive mine. Because we exist.
We exist.
SL “Lisa” Huang uses her MIT degree to write eccentric mathematical superhero fiction, starting with her debut novel, Zero Sum Game. Her short stories have sold to The Book Smugglers and Strange Horizons. In real life, you can usually find her hanging upside down from the ceiling or stabbing people with swords, and online she’s unhealthily opinionated at www.slhuang.com or on Twitter.
hk hill
February 28, 2015 @ 12:07 pm
Gee, Jim, you and Scalzi are responsible for my buying and adding so many books to my to read list. Thank you! I appreciate you giving a voice to those who have long been silenced, and introducing me to authors I probably wouldn’t have noticed. The issues of representation are important. Fiction should be a window, not a mirror.
Jim C. Hines
February 28, 2015 @ 12:09 pm
Always happy to add to people’s TBR Tower 🙂
Clay Dowling
February 28, 2015 @ 12:17 pm
Any time you feel like your characters have to be a certain way, read something from Samuel R. Delaney. His characters are definitely off the mainstream. I also think his writing is beautiful.
mjkl
February 28, 2015 @ 12:20 pm
“A window, not a mirror” – what a great phrase and way of looking at it!
Kanika Kalra
February 28, 2015 @ 4:16 pm
Being a woman of color, I cannot thank you enough for writing this. It’s not that I haven’t previously read articles and essays about representation and intersectionality. I’ve read tonnes of those. But, unlike others, your piece is so eloquent and precise that I feel like you have somehow looked into my mind and created order out of the mess of my thoughts.
From, “Gradually, the juxtaposition of my accomplishments with my intersectionality have begun giving me frissons of unreality, as if I’m a monkey playing the piano,” to “I do not need anyone’s permission to be a hero.” From imagining yourself as a sidekick, to deciding that you are, in fact, the protagonist – you have articulated the journey exactly as I experienced it.
Thank you!
LauraA
February 28, 2015 @ 6:50 pm
Very nicely put! I think you’re absolutely right about the way that the media, and people in general, tend to get a bit antsy about having to deal with more than one degree of difference from whatever they see as “regular” (which in so many contexts is equivalent to male, white, able, CIS, etc.) In an entirely different context, I once came across this at work, when we were trying to get media coverage to help recruit people to a study. Getting publicity to help people quit smokeless tobacco instead of smoking was easy to publicize, because people thought that was an interesting difference, not just the usual “quit smoking” program. Getting publicity to help people who want to encourage a loved one to quit smoking is also pretty straightforward. But getting publicity to help encourage a loved one to quit smokeless tobacco… apparently that’s way too complicated to describe in a short news story. The editors really did just want one degree of difference from the ordinary.
As a psychologist, I don’t think we can ever completely overcome the human tendency to think in terms of categories, and unfortunately that means that we may always have a tendency to see people as representatives of categories, at least until we get to know them. But I do think we can do something about this division of the world into “regular,” “close enough to regular to be interesting” (like those Star Trek captains), and “different and too complicated.” And I think the trick to it might be that when talk of differences comes up, we should turn it on its head, and instead talk about “generic” vs. “interesting.”
PhilRM
February 28, 2015 @ 7:55 pm
This was a great post; than you. Also, James Nicoll’s review of your second novel (Half Life – review is here: http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/back-to-russells-attic) made me want to run out to get both of your novels (not yet done, but soon).
PhilRM
February 28, 2015 @ 7:55 pm
Ack: Thank you.
A. Pendragyn
February 28, 2015 @ 11:06 pm
“We exist.”
Yes, so much yes. Thank you for writing this.
Nenya
March 1, 2015 @ 12:45 am
First of all, Ms. Huang, I read Zero Sum Game (on Jim’s rec, actually) and loved it. Especially as a female math nerd myself. And omg, the sequel is out now?? Yessss. 😀
To the essay–“the Star Trek captain problem”–god, yes. That’s exactly it. And like reality has a busted chair leg, when perfectly likely, possible people like you and your friends somehow are strange and bizarre in fiction. I know that feel. Maybe the sharp clear thoughts in this essay will help me get past a bit of my own “but is it/will they think it is too unbelievable?” Thank you.
(And a half-Chinese-human, half-Trill Starfleet Captain, you say? Gosh. I would read that so hard. :D)
Erica Wagner
March 1, 2015 @ 12:54 am
Really nice post!
TheOtherDibbler
March 1, 2015 @ 3:12 am
This reminded me so much of reading a book written by a friend of mine. The protagonist is a gender-queer, masculine-presenting, FAAB person, attracted primarily to women (cis or otherwise), with an ‘invisible’ disability that causes chronic pain, equally chronic depression, and a burning desire to make the world they live in a better, more accepting place for people like themself. As I read the story, part of my brain kept going “Dude, that’s too many things in one character, it’s not believable” even while knowing that the exact same description fits my friend who wrote the book. My friend is a real person, and they are an awesome person, so why should a character just like them be branded ‘unrealistic’ and not allowed to be the hero of their own story, just as they are?
Thank you Ms Huang for being another author who is not afraid to point this out and gift the rest of us with realistic heroes who differ from the constructed fictional ‘realism’ we so often forget is not realistic at all.
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:12 am
Someone over on Livejournal recommended Delaney, too! He’s been on my TBR list for….ever. I’ll have to make him a priority.
Thanks for the rec!
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:13 am
Wow.
Thank you for this comment. Thank you so much.
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:15 am
Oh, thank you! I was quite delighted when James reviewed me — I hope you like the books!
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:16 am
You’re welcome.
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:16 am
🙂
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:19 am
Wow, thank you for all the kind words, both on my fiction and on the essay. Good luck with your writing — I think it’s all sort of a work in progress for all of us. 🙂 I’m so very glad I could be a little bit helpful.
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:20 am
Thank YOU for this comment. And I hope your friend’s book gets published; it sounds like something I would love to read.
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:21 am
Thank you!
SL Huang
March 1, 2015 @ 11:26 am
What an interesting comparison. In re: the human need for categorization, I’m not a psychologist (at all!), but I find for me personally, what helps me not categorize as “other” is looking around and realizing something is actually my normal. Then I can force myself to ask the question of “why am I knee-jerk ‘othering’ this quality in my fiction when it’s all around me (either in other fiction or in reality)?” It’s one reason I’ve become so dedicated to writing diversely, so that my fiction can become part of the landscape and hopefully be one tiny piece that helps normalize diversity for other people. 🙂
thnidu
March 2, 2015 @ 3:50 am
Thank you for this very clear, very well written and convincing description of this problem.
MT
March 2, 2015 @ 12:54 pm
In some ways it reminds me of all those medical dramas. Bear with me on this.
In them we see a patient with Mysterious Illness. And people randomly gabble on about it being this or that or the other. And in the end there is a diagnosis. Of a single disease. And it has an end, and the person goes on.
I can tell you, as a person who is at a doctor’s office as a patient at least once every three months.. this is so weird. There’s never really “one thing”. And it doesn’t have a discrete moment of being over or of starting. It blends and blurs and involves a lot of factors… but somehow we keep doing “believable” medical dramas as if people only have ONE illness at a time.
Much like we like our protagonists to be A Single Character Trait person. They’re gay sleuth. They’re the Asian mage. The anxiety disorder cop. They’ve always got a thing. As in one.
In ten seconds or less use all the labels and ticks you can about yourself. And suddenly it’s a flurry of things that starts to get out of control. But it points to multidimensional people. (shrug) It’s nice when our writing shows that blurry, messy ball of chaos. And has it save the day.
Kaz
March 3, 2015 @ 6:49 pm
Thank you, thank you, thank you. This really got to the heart of something I’ve been feeling for so long. That wobbly chair leg, I guess. The subconscious thought that I tick too many boxes from too many identity categories to ever actually be able to see myself or write myself in fiction. That it’s just too much to expect something like a character who is autistic and has a speech disorder, and is queer, and nonbinary, and an immigrant whose native language isn’t English, and and and to exist in fiction. That, in fact, it’s too much to expect to have any character who matches more than one of those things – two at the absolute maximum.
I’m to cobble together my representation from bits and pieces, add together all the one-deviation-away-from-normal: the straight cis autistic guy (please don’t be an Asshole Genius) + the straight cis otherwise-NT man who stutters (please don’t be a character flaw) + the straight cis nondisabled asexual man (please don’t be evil or an alien) + the cis nondisabled lesbian + … = as close to me as I’m going to get.
But I get whiteness for free each and every time! Because no one tosses that into these calculations. No one ever goes “this character is nondisabled *and* cis *and* male *and* straight *and* white – that’s too much!” In the meantime… oh, I know what you mean about the frisson of unreality. I have a little voice in my head that tells me my own existence is statistically implausible and sometimes I end up astonished that I’m actually real. (I try to remember that that’s not how statistics work. It doesn’t help.)
I’m sorry, that was a ramble. Just – really. This is an amazing post. Thank you for writing it.
lauraa
March 4, 2015 @ 4:00 am
I’m looking forward to reading your books — thanks for the post! 🙂
SL Huang
March 4, 2015 @ 2:45 pm
You’re very welcome.
SL Huang
March 4, 2015 @ 2:47 pm
What a fantastic metaphor. I love this! And you’re totally right! We always seem to want fiction to be simpler and more easily categorizable than reality. I agree, I love “blurry, messy balls of chaos” that reflect our world. 😀
SL Huang
March 4, 2015 @ 3:10 pm
Thank YOU for this comment (and it wasn’t a ramble at all!). I so agree with this: “I have a little voice in my head that tells me my own existence is statistically implausible and sometimes I end up astonished that I’m actually real. (I try to remember that that’s not how statistics work. It doesn’t help.)” So, so, true.
SL Huang
March 4, 2015 @ 3:11 pm
Oops, the comment below was supposed to be in reply to you.
Mary Scotton | What I Learned at Lesbians Who Tech
March 5, 2015 @ 8:57 am
[…] Huang wrote a powerful essay on intersectionality, and on how the underrepresented remain underrepresented, even when […]
Diana M. Pho
March 12, 2015 @ 5:34 pm
Thanks for writing this. As a fellow QWoC who lives on the axis, I really appreciate your thoughtful breakdown on the importance of intersectionality when writing characters.
Plus, the explanation of the “Star Trek captain problem” is just golden.
Breaking Mirrors – Diana Pho
March 13, 2015 @ 8:31 am
[…] also ties in to some of what S. L. Huang said about intersectionality. I love the way these individual guest posts overlap and work together to (hopefully) build a […]
Swerve in the City of Blades Immortal Heights | Literary Escapism
March 13, 2015 @ 12:41 pm
[…] […]
SL Huang
March 13, 2015 @ 3:24 pm
You’re quite welcome. Thank you for your piece; I just read it — absolutely love the shattered mirror imagery. That’s exactly how it feels!